why won't Congress stop the war ? They have to power to cut off funding?

Question

All these Democrats were elected to stop the war. But they still continue to fund the war.

Answer 1

Because the Democrats who now control Congress are cowards. They want it both ways. They want the anti-war crowd to support them so they pass some lame "non-binding resolution" condemning the war surge, but they don't have the GUTS to cut off funding for fear of looking like they don't support the troops.

They don't have the courage of their convictions and it's just another example of the Democrats' moral bankruptcy.

Answer 2

That's an unfounded presumption that all these Democrats were elected to stop the war. However, Congress can defund it, true. But do they really want to put the lives of our troops in harm? Defunding the war will not stop it because we face a ruthless enemy who is still well funded. They will be even more enboldened if Congress defunds our troops. And,in case you didn't realize it, John Murtha is already working on a stealth way to defund our troops. So, get your own guns and ammo while you, you might need them sooner than later. It will no doubt move onto our soil.

Answer 3

They weren't elected to stop the war. They were elected to oust extreme right wingers. Trust me - Democrats are only going to make matters worst. The party is too conflicted within. And they too are also influenced by corporate dollars. You think that Halliburton's not going to throw them a bone since the Democrats are now in power? Are you naive enough to think that Democrats won't accept it? They are just as corrupt as every other political party. Corporations run this country and there is TOO MUCH money to be made from war. It like the ol' saying with regards to the cure for cancer: There's no money in the cure.

Answer 4

Congressman Kucinich called Wednesday for cutting off funding of the Iraq war, as the surest way out of Iraq. His statements were made in an interview by Democracy Now!'s Amy Goodman.

"I want to say that there's one solution here, and it's not to engage in a debate with the President, who has taken us down a path of disaster in Iraq, but it's for Congress to assume the full power that it has under the Constitution to cut off funds. We don't need to keep indulging in this debate about what to do, because as long as we keep temporizing, the situation gets worse in Iraq.

"We have to determine that the time has come to cut off funds. There’s enough money in the pipeline to achieve the orderly withdrawal that Senator McGovern is talking about. But cut off funds, we must. That's the ultimate power of the Congress, the power of the purse. That's how we'll end this war, and that’s the only way we’re going to end this war.

"We need to shift our direction."

"We have to take a whole new approach. We’re spending over $400 billion a year, money that's also needed for healthcare, for education, for job creation, for seniors. We have to take a new look at this. We need to be a strong country, but strength isn't only military. Strength is also the economic strength of the people, their chance to have good neighborhoods. We spend more money than all the countries of the world put together for the military.

"It's time for us to start to shift our vision about who we are as a nation, because if we don't do that -- we’re borrowing money right now to wage the war in Iraq. We’re borrowing money from China. We’re not looking at our trade deficit. We’re not looking at conditions, where people are going bankrupt trying to pay their hospital bills. We need to shift our direction, and the direction has to be away from the continued militarization of the United States society."

Answer 5

Because a great number of them voted for the war in the first place. They do not agree with it, but would look bad if they dropped the funding at this point in time.

Answer 6

the form promises training and to renowned it completely a radical understanding of reason is likewise needed. Ron Paul is the only candidate that incredibly has a continuing balloting checklist because of the reality he looks to the form every time he votes. there is a good variety of understanding there. Our Founding Fathers instantaneous us to be non-interventionist. Be a buddy to all international places, commerce with all international places yet are not getting entangled of their politics. advantageous, he replaced into warning human beings 30 years in the previous approximately matters that are occurring now. He has a radical understanding of the economic device, foreign places coverage and wellbeing care. he's the in basic terms top decision for united statesa..

Answer 7

Most of them voted for the war, and no one in Washington has the courage to admit they were wrong. It many ways, it is like Vietnam all over again and only new leadership can change the policy. None of the candidates running have a policy they will end our involvement, they only offer useless blame or threats about the future. None of them seem to have a solution.

Here is a solution: Stop spending 400 billion on the war, and spend it on research for a oil substitute, and stop sending all our money to countries that will always support terrorism. It would also employ our chemists that are suffering from massive unemployment due to outsourcing.

Answer 8

Congress wasn't elected Commander in chief
The Dem's are to cowardly to stand up for their views
then again who knows what they think until the next polls tell them how and what to think
heres what some thought just a few yrs ago

Answer 9

Seriously! Democrats have been in power for 6 weeks and they haven't solved the Iraq war yet

geez!

Answer 10

Which group in Congress has this power? Which group would dare leave our troops without military support?Not one group is privy to the information the President has as to what the course of our defenses are now.Revolution from within this country,or the legal procedures we have in place.Which do you choose?