yes I would take Nixon over Bush, Nixon only took away any relationship between the US currency and something concrete tried to rig and election, where as Bush has successfully rigged and election vs Gore and crushed the middle class. Didnt Nixon also start our job migration to China. Ya thanks to these 2 great presidents!!!
2007-02-16 05:15:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Nixon got caught covering up political spying. He got a lot of things right during his presidency but could not survive the cover up. Bush is doing what is in the best interest of America and is paying a political price for doing so by the media. Both of these Presidents have more good for the USA than any democrat in the last fifty years. And that's a fact!
2007-02-16 05:30:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by slodana2003 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Absolutely! At least Nixon was competent, corrupt, but competent. His foreign policy opened peace with China and paved the way for peace between Israel and Egypt. Nixon also was instrumental in ending the mess in Vietnam.
I am a Democrat that voted for Nixon twice because his opponents were appearing weak and uninformed. Nixon was paranoid and, as I mentioned, corrupt but compared to Bush he was an angel.
2007-02-16 05:12:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Why don't you put the blame where it really lies. This whole thing is the fault of the Democrat party. As bad as you think Bush is and for what ever reason. Consider this, the BEST the Democratic party had to offer was not able to beat him. So even IF Bush is the worse president EVER. The candidates the Democrats chose couldn't beat him.
And here's a news flash for you. Bush can't run again. So why not start working on a REAL Democrat candidate for the 2008 election. The left wingers that ran in the last two elections have really inhaled..
2007-02-16 05:24:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by namsaev 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
It wouldn't be a tough decision at all. At least Richard Nixon has the intelligence to be President. Bush, quite simply, just isn't presidential material.
2007-02-16 05:09:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
All GOP presidents are reviled by MSM while in office, but their accomplishments are tremendous. best example of this is the recently deceased Gerald Ford. while in office he was depicted as dumb (Yale Law school grad), clumsy (captain of the National champion U Mich football team). Only in death can the media bring up his accomplishments and his mockers (e.g. Chevy Chase) can admit that he was a great man.
Please don't judge W or any president by the hogwash put out by the MSM and the Hollywood Left.
2007-02-16 05:17:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by jimbo 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Absolutely! Nixon was deceiptful and underhanded in his politics, but he was a wise foreign policy pol. And he managed to get us out of Vietnam. Bush on the other hand got us into another Vietnam.
There's no comparison.
2007-02-16 05:11:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Nixon wasn't evil. He was paranoid. Do you have any idea what Nixon accomplished while he was president?
2007-02-16 05:10:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Yep, Nixon was much better than Bush
2007-02-16 05:08:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
No I think It is the time to look forward and move on.I am sure the Congress is now like a swarm of killer bees getting ready for take off.
2007-02-16 05:24:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dr.O 5
·
1⤊
1⤋