English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Specifically, what should the US do?

2007-02-16 04:56:02 · 10 answers · asked by American citizen and taxpayer 7 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

10 answers

It should not just be the US to the rescue as usual.
Maybe the UN should step up and do something substantive for once.

2007-02-16 05:00:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

When are the residents of Darfur going to rise up. They are dying anyway, why not die for something?

2007-02-16 13:19:01 · answer #2 · answered by KIB 4 · 2 0

Unless the US is willing to take down the Sudanese government and destroy the militas involved in the slaughter of what they consider unfaithful infidals nothing should be done. Darfur has no value to the US, however if we could use the killing there to justify the slaughter of muslims I would be all for it

2007-02-16 13:02:17 · answer #3 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 2 2

Honestly, who gives a crap? Maybe a nuke them or something like that. What the bleeding hearts of the world do not understand is that this is natural population control. We cannot have too many people on the earth. I am a huge believer of Social Darwinism and this is a prime example of Social Darwinism in action.

2007-02-16 13:01:49 · answer #4 · answered by Damn Good Dawg 3 · 1 1

The libs will take our troops out of Iraq and put them into Darfur to fight their civil war.
it's a politicaly correct war,like Bosnia,Haiti,and Somalia.

2007-02-16 13:01:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

The US should keep harping on the UN for justice there as well as the AU African Union who should come to the rescue of these people being slaughtered. But US can't enter another Arab war alone. The Sudan dictator is named #1 in terrorist leaders.

2007-02-16 13:01:00 · answer #6 · answered by spareo1 4 · 2 1

Let the UN and other countries deal with it for a change! Let the hollywood commies send their $$ over there and send their own troops.sean penn,fonda,baldwin and the likes!

2007-02-16 13:53:14 · answer #7 · answered by Classic96 4 · 1 0

Let China who is getting all the mineral contracts in the area take a leadership role!!!

2007-02-16 13:29:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

we should occupy there and stopp the killing, hell it be better than Iraq. but as the sudanese civil war started in 1898 and continues today I wouldn't count on it.

2007-02-16 13:09:49 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 0 2

take the troops out of Iraq send them there, stop the genocide of millions of innocent people..... help THEM rebuild

2007-02-16 13:00:00 · answer #10 · answered by diva 6 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers