English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-16 04:35:43 · 14 answers · asked by Just for Laughs 4 in Politics & Government Government

I should have added Hypothetical speaking!

2007-02-16 04:41:17 · update #1

14 answers

The end of democracy... finally !

2007-02-16 04:41:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

If there is a tie in an election the Returning Officer will toss a coin to decide who wins. So, I guess in your hypothetical case, the Returning Officer would have to arrange a fair means to chosing a winner (drawing the short straw perhaps). The normal process for forming a government from amongst the largest party in Parliament would then apply. realistically the largest is likely to be Labour or Tories, although it is less likely they would have an outright majority and parliament would include quite a few fringe issue MPs.

2007-02-16 07:19:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i visit be balloting for the only between the minor events that no longer in basic terms communicate approximately making a distinction, yet certainly gain this. the main useful rigidity team on the atmosphere, and the main useful rigidity team on retaining our endangered civil liberties. The vegetables i might urge unquestionably anyone who isn't involved in the three significant events to vote green. Realistically, that's tremendously no longer likely that they or the different minor party will win a seat decrease than the fptp device, yet a minimum of the vegetables can artwork nicely as a rigidity team to result substitute from outdoors government, and the greater suitable their help the simpler they could be. different minor events can do no longer something without representation, via fact the main events in simple terms do no longer take any notice of them. The vegetables are listened to. there isn't any different political party interior the united kingdom of any importance, whether significant or minor, who's regulations have not been stimulated via the vegetables schedule.

2016-12-17 11:27:13 · answer #3 · answered by moncalieri 4 · 0 0

If no body voted at the general election then nothing would happen. No one would be elected, there would be no MP's and as a consequence no government.

2007-02-18 08:13:29 · answer #4 · answered by Harry Hayfield 6 · 0 0

If nobody voted in England then labour would win on the back of votes in Scotland and a photocopy machine in Birmingham. So, just like last time.

2007-02-18 09:29:17 · answer #5 · answered by lotsmorewine 4 · 0 0

I would think that who ever is in power at the time will resume power and carry on until the NEXT election

2007-02-16 23:41:06 · answer #6 · answered by Curious39 6 · 0 0

Unfortunately this would never happen as some crooks such as politicians, the police, the drug dealers who own the countries companies would force people to vote so much for democracy.

2007-02-16 05:32:38 · answer #7 · answered by Stephen P 4 · 0 1

Labour would win by default, so Tony, no I mean Gordon would just carry on. Why can't we have a truthful, people (voters)friendly, dedicated, committed to the wellbeing and wellstanding(in the world) government?

2007-02-16 04:53:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

For starters the people who died to get us the vote would not be impressed.Next we would probably have all the nutters ruling.

2007-02-19 04:50:35 · answer #9 · answered by Ollie 7 · 0 0

The MPs would vote for each other. Sc*m

2007-02-18 07:09:06 · answer #10 · answered by k Marx ii 3 · 0 0

I really think that is a dumb question. Don't you think the people who have set themselves up for election and their handlers would vote?

2007-02-16 04:39:28 · answer #11 · answered by Anthony F 6 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers