That's a tough one for me, i never voted outside the Libertarian party, but if I had to choose. I would say John McCain. Maybe. Or Rudy. Maybe. Ahhhh! I don't know.
2007-02-16 04:23:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Out of the six, I think Guiliani is the only one who isn't awful. Newt has interesting ideas but claims that FDR is the greatest president of the 20th century - it makes me question what issues he is really committed to. McCain is too much of an establishmentarian. The Democrats have not respect for property rights.
2007-02-16 07:37:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jesus Jones 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Barack Obama. If he is not the Democratic Party choice then Rudy Guiliani.
2007-02-16 04:21:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sherilynne B 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
maybe Gingrich...
he of the above can actually state in a clear coherent fashion what he believes, or a plan AND why...
..don't always agree but admire his courage to NOT craft amorphous statements that are tailored to evoke guilt, anger, or need to make the "world" right for humanity's sake. well fare reform while unpopular did help this country.
..what I want is a candidate that will focus on the needs of THIS country ,not secretly hide their socialistic desires, believes that the land of opportunity provides individuals many ways to pursue their chosen path.
I do not want candidates that "believe" that we are obligated to guarantee and pay for "help/services/etc" for elements of society who-( while able ,choose to simply demand that their needs, wants and desires for life style,recognition,free medical, etc) be met..
This nation was formed by industrious,creative individuals who understood that opportunity was not without risk and would require hard work,learning new skills and perseverance.
Pioneers were never guaranteed fuel,housing, access to medical treatment,new start up $ when disaster hit (flood,fire, crop failure etc). We have evolved into a prosperous and generous society with Politicians who choose to retain their"life" career as they believe that their Job retention must be secured regardless of whether their actions are good for the country...
2007-02-16 05:17:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by ymicgee 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like Newt Gingrich, he is a visionary, a man of ideas.
The rest are too leftwing extremst, Guiliani might as well be a Dem
2007-02-16 04:19:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
that is for sure no longer plausible to slender it right down to a unmarried voter profile that the get mutually tries to attraction to, yet there have been some tendencies evidenced through the Ron Paul Revolution. for sure, he wasn't campaigning for the libertarian get mutually, yet his message grow to be almost completely depending in libertarianism. For the most area, the 'revolution' grow to be triumphant by and large through the internet medium. childrens, truly college scholars gave the impression to be attracted to his message. i wager you need to call it the 'dignified poor.' except that I agree that that is confusing to pinpoint it to race/gender.
2016-12-04 06:22:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I will never vote for a Republican or Democrat ever again! But if someone held a gun to my head I would pick.......death!
2007-02-16 15:04:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ah another supporter of the same old bull "thier can be only two parties" good to see party propaganda has the masses bahhhing away.
2007-02-16 04:22:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
those choices all follow partylines. If those are the only choices then there is no choice at all. that's a list of pathetic politicos who will tell you what you want to hear to get into office.
2007-02-16 04:27:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither, they're all globalists. My choice, is Ron Paul(R). He stands for a lot more than all those losers.
2007-02-16 05:06:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ted S 4
·
0⤊
0⤋