English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ok, I've asked 5 times and all the liberals spout off is how Bush got us in this mess and not how to resolve the problem realistically. The congress is doing the same thing. I want our troops out, ASAP, but then what?? The terrorists can get to us through the Mexican border or Canadian for that matter. My question is how do we get the terrorists to lighten up and stop attacking us or is too late and we just keep on fighting til milliions are dead...Not trying to be partisan, just want to hear realistic possibilities.

2007-02-16 03:42:15 · 16 answers · asked by bigbro3006 3 in News & Events Current Events

16 answers

The only solution to islamic fundamentalist terrorism is to kill all of the islamic fundamentalists. They attack us not because we are forcing our beliefs on them...they attack us simply because we are different and because we will not assimilate their beliefs. Their mission is to create an islamic world, just as Hitler's mission was to create an Aryan world. You cannot negotiate with a group who believes in only one acceptable outcome and who will lie and do whatever it takes to get that outcome. Look at Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. He puts on a facade in front of the cameras and at the "negotiations" because he knows that the media and liberals will believe him. When he is with his people, however, his true intentions are revealed. They will stop at nothing to kill all of us and the attacks and violence will not stop until each and every one of them are dead.

*I just have to add that all of you morons who still think this is just a war for oil need to open up your eyes and get your head out of the donkey's ***. We are the richest country in the world. Why would we start a 5 year war for oil when we could just buy it? Grow up! America does have problems, but America is NOT the problem!

2007-02-16 03:58:01 · answer #1 · answered by griffon1426 3 · 1 0

The terrorest are celluar they work in 5 ot 10 man teams they have no country they move about the only thing that brings them together is their belife that they must bring us and other non muslim contries down.. What ever their belifes we need to relize that attacking Iraq was really sensless because we have 3000 dead when the terrost dont even claim the country. hey the 9/11 deal was all Saudies by all rights we should have attacked Saudi but Bush has other agendas.. we need to tighten up our borders we need to watch closley every new person coming into america but we do not need to take rights of the american public away. so iraq was other business,, i belive to get the U.S. situated there in the middle east to be ready for future action because buddy we will never leave now never. we support Isreal like it or not we are there

2007-02-16 13:15:22 · answer #2 · answered by bone g 3 · 0 0

We are in the same position Israel has been in since it was founded. We have a well financed, well organized, fanatical force committed to our destruction. We are a much harder target to hit than Israel is but the enemy will hit whenever an opportunity arises. This fight will continue and American soldiers will die until the enemy is killed to the last man. Keeping the pressure on them in their own front yard keeps them from mounting attacks on our own soil (so far) and pulling out of Iraq will give them breathing room to regroup and hit us on our own soil. We dont have to fight them in our own streets like the Israelis do but that could change if we quit the fight. Remember.....these guys dont care if they go home after a fight. Death for the cause is honor. If they sneaked a force across the mexican border a few at a time until they had a sizeable number they could raise a lot of hell before we could kill them all.

2007-02-16 12:16:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The Shaw of Iran, Osama Bin Lauden, the Taliban, and Sadam were all supported and funded by the US tax dollar until their excesses became too obnoxious to endure. In every case the motivating factor was exploitation of Mid East oil reserves and or access to it.

A policy of exploitation, corrupt political meddling, general lack of empathy and respect for foreign cultures and peoples and a militant attitude in general is the parent of terrorism world wide and more of the same will spawn more of the same.
Perhaps if the American people had a little more grit and less fat the terrorists would slip and fall on the left over grease and every one would be happier and healthier for it.

.

2007-02-16 14:22:20 · answer #4 · answered by Daniel O 3 · 0 0

Lighten up on the liberals will you Chico?

When you get older - you will realize that to some issues - there are no reallistic solutions - and Iraq is one of them.

The people of Iraq have been fighting one enemy after another since the beginning of dawn and their empires and civilizations came and went which included Summer, Babylon, Persia and those empires that came and went long before they arrived on the scene.

Bush refers to the present day "terrorists" as Islamic radicals - but he doesn't have the slightest idea what or who they are or what would it get them to stop with all of their terror! All he belives is that they want to kill us all - but he has no clue as to why they want to do this!

And neither does 90% of Americans or the rest of the world because no one has bothered to sit down with them and talk to them about it or asked them what the hell their ***** was!

These terrorists have been sending us messages ever since they deposed the Shaw of Iran - and yet nobody in Washington even cared or bothered to listen!

Being realistic I would have to say that our only way out of this situation is to have to kill them all since we do not have the time, effort, or intellligence to sit down with them!

Now you may call this appeasement if you wish - but I certainly think that it would be more realistic than just trying to kill them all!

And - after we sit down and discuss the situation - we can always kill them off then if that will be our only solution to the problem.

2007-02-16 12:39:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think it IS too late for a "withdraw with honor" as they said we did in 'Nam.
The power vacuum would no doubt be filled by radicals if we left the "door open"
With 4 million "displaced Iraqis" already, the future looks to be a long tiresome and costly mistake. George W wasnt alone when his decision was made, in fact, remember when we learned that not one, NOT ONE, lawmaker even read the Patriot Act before blindly approving it.
NOBODY spoke up when 'W' "invented" Homeland Security to do what 12 other agencies were failing to do, and its still a failure!
Great question, the possibilities, in MY opinion look grim.

2007-02-16 11:56:36 · answer #6 · answered by pompanopete0 4 · 0 0

What war on terror? What our Government has done is disguise a quest for oil and a better military position in the middle east as a war on terror. Iraq was simply a weak spot to position the U.S. militarily against the perceived greater threat Iran. However it hasn't gone as planned. Terrorism can't really be stopped by war, look at the Palestinian/Israeli situation, if someone is willing to die to get they're point across, there really isn't much of a chance to get them to lighten up

2007-02-16 11:54:22 · answer #7 · answered by galileo0169 1 · 0 2

That's the point. You hit the nail on the head. The terrorists have stated that they will not be happy until Americans are DEAD. Simply ending the conflict in Iraq or Afghanistan will not solve the problem.

2007-02-16 11:45:38 · answer #8 · answered by Kerry 7 · 1 1

Crystal S is right,it wont stop until all of the people that are pissed off at us are dead,i say a few properly placed nukes would take care of alot of them,i know it sounds bad -but i bet they say the same about us dont you agree!- and they WILL do it pretty soon if we dont act first!

2007-02-16 13:14:21 · answer #9 · answered by overdriver64 3 · 0 0

Maybe if the US would stop going clear around the world, to trespass, attack and terrorize weak countrys with oil, then maybe the people there wouldn't fight back. America could be a friendly country, but it just plain isn't.

2007-02-16 11:50:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers