As twice claimed by Cheney in 2004 and 2005
2007-02-16 02:56:38 · 12 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well, actually it's throes. Yes, there can be more than one which is why it is a plural noun. As with the last of anything, each throe should not be "the last one" too many times. Thanks for the question because it's good to keep people on their toes. By the way we are a long way from the last throes of this insurgency. These insurgents, wherever they are employing their tactics and wherever they come from, are well funded by a group of supremely dedicated religious zealots intent on world domination and the extermination of Americans. They actually have a mission statement and that is in it. This is worse than the Nazi Regime.
2007-02-16 03:42:55 · answer #1 · answered by Mac 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well sure they are in their last throws. But what happens is, more insurgents take the place of the dead insurgents and then it just keeps repeating.
So Cheney wasnt really lying, we all know he is a good honorable man who would never lie.
2007-02-16 03:18:55 · answer #2 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't think of that the Iraqi counter-circulation ever had a lot of a probability--the Western media underestimate the blended militia and police potential of the political-clerical equipment in Iran. that is fairly no longer previous and tottering in any respect, and the most conservative clericism continues to be the norm outside Tehran. What the circulation confirmed the elite is that the city inhabitants would must be managed one way or the different, and that i imagine that it is already occurring. what's forgotten is that in the previous there grow to be a properly prepared Left, a exertions Left, in Iran, which saved the non secular ideology in examine. because the West is all tied up with free-market extremism and an unworkable variety of "globalization" in the present day--it is, tied up in its personal ridiculous fantasies of triumphalism and potential--no one signifies that bringing again the Left in Iran is the answer. besides the undeniable fact that it is. that is the in trouble-free terms way out of this deadlock.
2016-12-04 06:17:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually John, one of the most violent areas in Anbar Province, which is nowhere near Baghdad. This is why the Amerucan publica is fed up. The people running this war seem to have no idea what is even going on over there.
2007-02-16 03:03:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Maybe they're in a "vegetative state" instead like Teri Schiavo.
Let's get Bill Frist to make a diagnosis...
2007-02-16 03:05:01 · answer #5 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mean the Baghdad insurgents. The vast majority of the violence takes place within 20 miles of the capital.
Please do some reseach. But thanks for the laughs
2007-02-16 02:59:53 · answer #6 · answered by John 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No they are able to throw and throw again . watch the news .
2007-02-16 03:03:33 · answer #7 · answered by katrinasfather 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It'll happen after we turn the corner and then stand down as they stand up... or something like that.
2007-02-16 03:01:48 · answer #8 · answered by ck4829 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe you're talking about Baghdad, brudda.
2007-02-16 03:02:23 · answer #9 · answered by Mr. Info 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've been in mine since '89.
2007-02-16 03:00:11 · answer #10 · answered by Crystal Blue Persuasion 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋