That was a big disagreement between Libs and Cons on here?
2007-02-16 02:56:00 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Now since it came from Bush I wander if the cons on here will believe it.
Which I have to say thats the only thing I have agreed with him on. I support the troops, I support america, I do not support the president.
2007-02-16 03:01:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Normal, civil, productive discourse is fine and welcomed. That is a strength in a democracy.
However what is objectionable is how indiscriminately the Libs blindly bash everything that Bush says or does. If God himself came down from Heaven on a shaft of light and proclaimed to the world that Bush was doing good work, the Libs would just say, "@ss kisser Bush!".
2007-02-16 11:28:55 · answer #2 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It isn't unpatriotic to disagree with Bush on his war plans but it is the way that some people on here do it. They can't just say they disagree and explain why and offer something better, they attack, attack our president and the administration, and the country. Thats very unpatriotic and of no use to anyone except to create low morale. Then like the media twists facts and get the public all stirred up, very unpatriotic!
2007-02-16 11:03:02 · answer #3 · answered by Brianne 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I could care less if liberals disagree with Bush's war plans. What I don't agree with is them "spitting" on our troops. That's the sign of a coward.
2007-02-16 11:30:09 · answer #4 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Patriotism starts at the top(militarily) and begins it's rapid dissent to the bottom(non-participation) There's a huge difference between being a patriot,and saying that you are one....(thus) the afore mentioned scale, where do you fit in..
2007-02-16 11:01:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Cons, the Duh-cider has spoken. And disagreeing with the Duh-cider is unpatriotic.
So by calling Libs unpatirotic for disagreeing with the Duh-cider, you are thereby disagreeing with the Duh-cider and are, ipso facto, UNPATRIOTIC!
2007-02-16 11:02:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I agree with that.
But I also agree with Australian PM Howard that the Dems' incessant talk of surrender have done more damage to the US troops and than all the IEDs and car-bombs of the terrorist insurgents.
2007-02-16 11:13:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Called pressure from truth, it is very patriotic to disagree.
2007-02-16 11:01:14 · answer #8 · answered by edubya 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.
2007-02-16 11:42:24 · answer #9 · answered by jcboyle 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is a devil worshipper in a secret society. He only thinks about himself. Hiding away in a bunker while the rest of the nation fears the enemies next moves.
2007-02-16 10:58:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋