he is mine.....If he wouldve said he hated all Christians then you media losers would scream "freedom of speech" and the ACLU would back him with 100 lawyers.....Gay's arent a race...they are a sect of degenerates....(we dont give rights to child molesters, why give rights to homosexuals)
2007-02-16 01:36:57 · 6 answers · asked by voiceofreason 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
a comment cannot be deamed as hateful if it is true.....if it offends you...that a problem with your sensitivity :)
2007-02-16 02:38:50 · update #1
p.s....my email is there mr. blind....email me a hate-filled lecture if you want...it only fuels my fire against you degenerates
2007-02-16 02:40:33 · update #2
I AGREE WITH YOU 100 %. I DON'T KNOW WHY HE RECANTED BUT IN THE SPORTS WORLD THEIR IS NO ROOM FOR HOMO'S. AND LIKE HIM I CAN'T STAND THE FRUITY LITTLE MOTHER @#$%#^'S. THEY ARE NOT A RELIGION OR EVEN A MORAL GROUP. THEY ARE THE SCUM OF THE EARTH AND THEY DON'T DESERVE ANY SPECIAL RIGHTS BECAUSE THEY CHOOSE TO BE ABNORMAL.
2007-02-16 01:43:28 · answer #1 · answered by strike_eagle29 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Timmy has always been very outspoken. This time its going to cost him. At least he has the guts to express his views in public and not to back down from what he says and thinks. You don't even have a picture up or except emails.
And to make the claim "If he would've said he hated all Christians then you media losers would scream "freedom of speech" and the ACLU would back him with 100 lawyers" shows your lack of true understanding of what is happening. He is not getting roasted for exercising his Free Speech Rights. He is getting nailed for his hateful, ignorant viewpoint. Sorta like you.
2007-02-16 09:47:21 · answer #2 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
First, Hardaway hasn't been charged with a crime, so he would need no lawyers from anyone. Second, the difference between gays and molesters are glaring. Gays do their acts with other consenting adults. Molesters do their acts against non consenting kids who lack the mental facilities to consent even if they wanted to. I guess in your logic there is no difference between me having a beer on my 30th birthday while at home, and my kid's kindergarten teacher forcing him to drink a beer instead of milk during lunchtime.
2007-02-16 09:48:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
You have some very strong points.
2007-02-16 09:41:50 · answer #4 · answered by slodana2003 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
He DID apologize.
I think his original comments were disgusting.
Hate is not the answer.
2007-02-16 09:48:52 · answer #5 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
very well put!
2007-02-16 09:40:37 · answer #6 · answered by woody 5 · 6⤊ 2⤋