You have summed up the Democrats mentality. I guess liberal is just a term to them. " If it's not their way then it must be wrong".There has been many people in history with the same mentality....They were called Dictators, Tzars, Emperors, etc. If the Democrats were allowed total control they would quickly for get about Democracy and become one of the aforementioned persons. I guess that could be the same for anyone with total control. "Absolute Control Corrupts absolutly"
2007-02-16 01:51:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tom M 3
·
0⤊
4⤋
Simply because people who identify themselves as liberals and conservatives are extremists or wannabe extremists. They tend to be political cultists who like any cult have no room for the exchange of ideas. Liberals are virtually the same things as conservative in that each is so dogmatic they serve no positive purpose in political discourse or elections for that matter. Libs desparetly need to believe that the religious right elected Bush when it is an easily seen fact that Dem voters crossed over and elected Bush twice simply because the Dem candidates were too far from center. This is a moderate country and that is why few things change radicallly regardless of what the barking dogs in the parties say. Bush did not reverse gun laws, outlaw abortion or do any of the things that leftists claimed would be the result of electing him. He went to war and did it with a Dem majority Congress, though now they must make all kinds of excuses as to why they agreed with him (about ten different times in key Congressional votes). Conservatives think that the US wants to have Christianity imposed as a national religion and are shocked each time its not, and yet there is little support that anything like that either. If American Muslims had the courage to speak up for America and against extremism, it would be a major religion in the US. It may have lost that chance by being silent. Pro life and pro choice are just forums for radicals, people will do what they think is right and elect candidates who promise to do the least harm. No one of any intelligence would identify themselves as a lib or conservative because it just means "I am so stupid that I can hold only one view at a time on any issue". Libs/conservs are one issue people who see the world in the simplest terms, don't mind telling others how to live and they count for nothing in elections because they X each other out. The are just for noise.
2007-02-16 01:36:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Tom W 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Liberals believe in truth.. so by that logic.. how COULD they accept most conservative policies..
Take Iraq as a perfect example.. when it all went down.. liberals were totally lambasted in the meida.. from Dizie chics to anyone who was against the war..
WEll.. we now know that all the intelligence was fabricated.. and the motives were falsified and the outcome has been FAILURE!!
So WHY would Liberals EVER accept your views again???
In a nutshell.. Conservatives are about self preservation.. at any cost.. evne if it means starting wars and murdering hundreds of thousands of innocents.. this is something liberals will never accept.. no matter how you conservative lot try to dress it up.. but to Liberals.. murder is wrong..
2007-02-16 01:30:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
Because it is beyond the liberals capacity to accept there is even the remotest possibility their solutions or positions could be wrong. And since liberals are never wrong their logic says since conservatives are the opposite of a liberal, conservatives can never be right. So in good moral conscience they can never accept a conservative point of view because to agree with the conservative point of view would mean they were wrong and liberals know they can never be wrong. So they can never agree with a conservative.
Kind of a Catch-22 situation.
2007-02-16 01:46:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by namsaev 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
If the dictionary is of any help, try looking up the definitions of both 'liberal' and 'conservative'. Then come back and consider your question. This is what happens when information as a diet gets fed by the media counselors of the hate-filled neo-con camp.
2007-02-16 01:36:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Oh man, you are so full of s***, there aint' a laxative that could help you. I see negative feedback from you cons every single day I post anything in the politics & government section. From what I see in so many other posts, you cons do the vast majority of the insulting and bit**ing while the libs mostly just speak their minds.
I dunno. Maybe I just don't spend as much of my valuable time on here as you do, but the inability to think with an open mind is not something you can attribute to one group of people. That's like saying just one group of people go to the bathroom.
2007-02-16 02:07:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ledge 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
however the subject is which you have self assurance that Democrats try to regulate your existence, yet you have positioned up no evidence previous the reality that the Republican occasion says it on an identical time they try to regulate your existence (and you probably did positioned up evidence of that). As appropriate as i can tell, your point out of "government intervention" ability the bailout and stimulus. nicely, the bailout became into fullyyt Bush's theory, and it gave unfastened money devoid of strings related to massive-scale companies. The stimulus became right into a mixture of tax cuts for the middle and decrease training, loans and provides you to small companies (those with a hundred workers or much less), and money to states so as that they might stability their budgets to boot as supply investment for diverse jobs of their choosing. So the bailout became into company welfare, regardless of the undeniable fact that it got here from Bush. The stimulus became into tax cuts, helping out small companies, and allowing states greater administration jointly as balancing the value selection; and it got here from Obama. And as you talked approximately, the Republicans prefer to regulate who you are able to and can't spend YOUR existence with, what women can do with THEIR bodies, what God we could have self assurance in and what we could have self assurance approximately that God. In different words, you only have self assurance Democrats try to regulate you because of the fact Republicans repeat that repeatedly, jointly as by no ability truthfully offering any evidence. yet you your self have offered the evidence that Republicans incredibly try to regulate you.
2016-11-23 12:54:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
How come you can't come up with an innovative way to ask or state the same argument? And how come you can't see the very same thing is happening for the conservatives? Is America's collective head that far in the sand?
2007-02-16 01:30:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Super Ruper 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
Define your terms. By "accepted", do you mean "agreed upon and adopted" or do you mean "heard soberly and respectfully and analyzed thoughtfully and without bias"?
Please come back when you're ready to make the unsubstantiated point that you REALLY want to make, rather than couching it in a superficially civil question.
2007-02-16 01:30:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I am 38 yrs old.
I spent the first 18 years of my life listening to my grandparents and the Catholic church trying to indoctrinate me into Christianity.
Too much hypocrisy in that institution for my tastes.
I listen to the Bush administration trying to indoctrinate fear of Radical Islam into my life and I feel exactly the same hypocrisy.
Why is it OK to trade freely with China who is just as fear inducing towards humanity as Iran???
Liberalism just by virtue of definition allows for belief in EACH and EVERY idea. In liberalism each person can make up their own minds.
Conservatism on the other hand requires everyone to follow one line of thought!
The USA was formed by people who did not want to follow one line of thinking......what the English were thinking at the time.
If the US was meant to be a singular Theocracy there would be no need for a constitution at all!!
Our founding fathers wanted a better way!
They wanted all men and women to be free to make up their own minds and live freely in their pursuits.
If you want to believe what you believe...more power to you!
But why do you not in turn allow me to think and believe what I want to????
2007-02-16 01:45:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋