No matter what we think Anna Nicole did or didn't do, I still believe that she loved her son with every breath that she took. I really think she wanted and needed to be with him. My question is : How can her "mother" that she had nothing to do with want to take her body back to texas to be buried knowing full well that she(Anna Nicole) had intended to be buried next to Daniel. Why leave Daniel alone in the Bahamas.Sounds likes her "mother" is still trying to torture her in death!!!
2007-02-16 01:01:19 · 6 answers · asked by Gayle S 1 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
I think her mother is a big time B. word. Why can't she just leave the daughter that she disliked so much alone now? Anna N.S. would want to be buried next to the son she loved so much and everyone knows it, except the one that should understand it the most.
2007-02-16 01:08:22 · answer #1 · answered by smcdevitt2001 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
According to Anna Nicoles genealogy, her mother Vergie Tabers had Anna Nicole (aka Vickie Lynn Hogan) at age 16. Anna was a second child her first was a child that she had with her step-brother, David Luther Tacker.YUCK. Vergie has been married to at least 5 people (Donald Hogan, Donald Hart, Joe D Thompson, James T Sanders and James H Arthur!) and she is only 55 years old! Anna Nicole didn't live with her mother growing up it is documented in Wikipedia that she lived with an aunt. Ole Vergie had 3 children with three different daddies. Poor Anna Nicole never had a stable father figure in her life nor did she have a stable mother. Of course she had problems with her family and in her life and it is amazing she did as well as she did.
Now Vergie has gone down to the Bahamas to stake her claim on her granddaughter and then to Florida to claim Anna Nicoles body. How dare she! Anna Nicole shouldn't be buried anywhere but next to her son. . And as for Dannielynn, Vergie failed her own children, what makes her think that she can be any kind of parent now? She will mess up her granddaughters life too.
2007-02-16 09:12:55 · answer #2 · answered by Tereka Bodika 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I hate her mother. If she really loved her daughter, and was not a greedy, selfish woman ... there would be no question that she would bury her daughter next to her beloved son, Daniel. This Virgie is everything and more, that Anna Nicole said she was, during Anna's interview on ET several months ago!!!
2007-02-18 22:26:52 · answer #3 · answered by A S 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think her mother will win, but anytime someone puts a claim like that in, the court basically have to give it the time of day. No one in their right mind would give custody of Anna's body to someone that hasn't seen her own daughter since 1995!!!
This is called money grubbing, pure and simple and despite the fact that it is Hollywood court, I don't think that anyone can deny the facts as they are.
2007-02-16 09:11:45 · answer #4 · answered by Caitlin M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hate to say it but I think her mother is wanting to cash in and is trying to get involved now that Anna is dead. I don't think HKS will allow this however, and being her husband, doesn't he get to decide where the burial and such will take place?
2007-02-16 09:11:52 · answer #5 · answered by child_n_light 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Seems to me like there is a lot of money problems going around with this one. I mean who gets what she left and who does not get what she left. All are after the left overs and it is sad.
2007-02-16 09:06:25 · answer #6 · answered by jjnsao 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋