If they would really know how to get rich, why then are not them busy just getting rich and instead, they teach how to get rich.
I mean, without any considerations, Economy is all about of getting rich, either as an individual, a company, corporation, any group and even a state or a country, right?
2007-02-16
00:10:39
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Carlos C
2
in
Social Science
➔ Economics
I wonder why so many stuff against Economy and richess.
What is the pint of studying stocks, or market strategy, or where to invest, and so on if it not to make money. Which would be the subject for such a theme?
And the fact that SOME professors make good money they are not rich, at least according to what Aristoteles Onasis saying:
While I know how much mony I do have, I do not consider my self rich. I understand this is a very subjective answer he gave some time in his past.
But Economy would be the art of knowing exactely when and where to put money and how much money should be put, managing all the factors in a way that that money would generate more money. Other wise why learn economy? Please tell me what would you do with a degree in economics other than contributing to make more money, for you or for the organisation you would be working for.
2007-02-16
07:28:54 ·
update #1
Unbelievable, ALL the answers have to do with money. And if it has to do with money why doesn't it has to do with getting rich as an individual, company or state? Is there a social-trauma regarding this relationship economy-money or what? One answer was even about sociology, the way it is put.
2007-02-18
16:18:26 ·
update #2
The question is simple: Lok at the world economy; look at your own economy; look at your friends' economy; look at the economy of the city you're living in; look at the economy of the rganisations you would favour or with which you sympathise; look at the economy of your state/country.
NOW, should we trust the Profs?
How many recently graduated do really succeed? Loo
2007-02-21
12:11:57 ·
update #3