2007-02-16 00:08:25 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Zoology
being a herbavore, the rabbit is less important than the fox.
because a fox is primarily a carnivore, and helps keep rabbit populations in check, as well a mice, and cleans up dead animals either on the road, or in the wild.
2007-02-16 00:14:36 · answer #1 · answered by hamm42 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Good professional biologist like myself don't rate one animal better than another. Both fox and rabbit have positive and negative attributes. Both have a place in the ecosystem. Both are generally enjoyed by humans.
So. Why would anyone pick one over the other?
2007-02-16 00:50:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both have their place in the food web. Get rid of either one, and there would be far-reaching consequences to many other parts of the web.
2007-02-16 04:59:09 · answer #3 · answered by zoogrl2001 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are both important parts of the circle of nature. Part of the natural checks and balances.
2007-02-16 00:11:46 · answer #4 · answered by Shredded Cottage Cheese 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ever heard of fornicate like foxes? I think not.
2007-02-16 08:30:51 · answer #5 · answered by Dead Robin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the rabbit. It can provide food and does not carry rabies.
2007-02-16 00:13:17 · answer #6 · answered by Shelly t 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Neither. We all have our place in the overall picture of life.
2007-02-16 00:11:23 · answer #7 · answered by Tara 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IMO the rabbit. My kids have rabbits and it's also my chinese astrology sign. ;)
2007-02-16 00:11:11 · answer #8 · answered by friendly face 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋