Just a quick survey ,how many of you still support the program ,as Bush says?

Question

his program as he now calls it in Iraq? do you support it or not?

Answer 1

bush is just trying to cover his own *** so the people of the U.S.A don't really figure out whats he done

hey starflower the only idiot is your own president and the exremists mulism as you put it..are not the ones destroying the west...its your own damn president...go do your homework!!!

Answer 2

I do not support it... Bush is wanting to still send in troops, while the troops that are there, are going into the heat of the battle that is between 2 different parts and are caught in the middle of it. These troops do not have the proper vests, do not have the proper military vehicles, The proper head wear to protect them. Some are even going into the heat with NO protection of any sort. And instead of Bush send the equipement they need instead he wants to send more troops.all this will prove is how many flag draped coffins will continue coming home.

Answer 3

The US has established new offices in the State Department and Pentagon to build an opposition movement in Iran to topple the government. US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice asked the US Congress a year ago for $75 million to supplement $10 million already allocated to underwriting the activities of dissidents in Iran and to expand Voice of American broadcasts. (Los Angeles Times, May 19, 2006) The CIA’s budget for programs aimed at bringing about regime change in Iran is probably many times larger.

In recent weeks, Washington has opened yet another front in its war on Iran: driving down the price of oil to reduce Iran’s revenue. The US can’t affect the price of oil itself, but it can pressure Saudi Arabia to increase output to bring prices down. In January, Ali al-Naimi, the Saudi oil minister, vetoed an emergency meeting of OPEC to discuss cutting production after oil dropped below $50 a barrel. The Saudis have signalled that they’re committed to keeping the price of oil hovering around $50 a barrel, down $27 a barrel from the summer. From Washington’s perspective, the high prices allow Iran (and another US bete noire, Venezuela) to export “radical agendas,” (New York Times, January 28, 2007) or more directly, to mount a threat of self-defense.

It’s unclear whether elements of the Israeli ruling circle are preparing to attack Iran or whether they’re simply engaged in a campaign of psychological warfare, seeking to unnerve Tehran by threatening war. The press is full of warnings of an imminent Israeli attack. “Two Israeli air force squadrons,” warned The Guardian (January 7, 2007) are training to use nuclear ‘bunker busting’ bombs to demolish Iran’s heavily guarded enrichment program.” (The Guardian, January 7, 2007.) The Independent (January 22, 2007) concluded that “senior Israeli politicians and analysts appear to be preparing the public for military conflict with Iran” and (January 25, 2007) “Israeli military officials warned … that Israel – acting alone or in coordination with the US – could launch pre-emptive military strikes against Iran before the end of this year.” The warnings were described by a senior British military source as “watering the turf.” Iran, the source said, “is not under enough pressure.” (The Independent, January 25, 2007.)

In early January, the Pentagon deployed a second aircraft carrier, the USS John Stennis to join a battle group led by the USS Dwight D Eisenhower, stationed menacingly close to Iran. (The Independent, January 14, 2007.) Britain also beefed up its complement of ships in the region (New York Times, December 21, 2006.) At the same time, the Pentagon dispatched a 600-strong Patriot anti-missile defense system to the Middle East. Asked to explain why the anti-missile defense system was being deployed, US Defense Secretary Robert Gates told a press conference that “We are simply reaffirming…the importance of the Gulf region to the United States and our determination to be an ongoing strong presence in that area for a long time into the future.” (Globe and Mail, January 15, 2007) US officials would later say the building naval presence was intended to deter Iran from trying to dominate the region.

Answer 4

Only intelligent people support President Bush's policies in Iraq. Judging by the polls there are a lot of idiots that don't understand how deranged Muslim extremist are to destroy all things Western.

Answer 5

I support the establishment and security of representative democracy in Iraq. I support the elimination of militant islamic ists. I support the spread of freedom and the elimination of state sponsors of ism.

Answer 6

I think he calls it a "program" in order to tone down the reality of it to the american people. Now that 74% of the nation is in uproar over it he's trying to sugar coat it.

I've never supported this war. It was going against the global communities advice so we should never have done it.

Answer 7

Of course I do! We made, in a way, a promise to the Iraqii people and we, as Americans, do not 'cut and run"!!! That is not what we are made of!!!!!

Answer 8

Support it.

Answer 9

I do. I see the benefits and the end game.

Answer 10

No, I do not support it, never in my life have I seen so many bad decisions by the president of the U.S.