The Supreme Court
The popular vote, which really isn't taken into consideration since we have an electoral college, would have gone to Gore.
2007-02-15 23:10:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by TheAnswerChicks 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
No, none of those solutions are maximum suitable. It became desperate via the electoral college. The kerfuffle in Florida happened whilst the Florida ideally suited court docket desperate to alter the regulations of the recount AFTER the election. This became considered as a contravention of the two the form, the place it states that that's as much as the state LEGISLATURES to be certain the tactic of choosing the electors. via fact state regulation already had a criminal recount technique time-honored, the introduction of a sparkling one via the Florida ideally suited court docket looks a contravention of Constitutional regulation, does it no longer? Secondly, whilst the handbook recount became allowed, there became no set of standards the thank you to count type votes to be certain the elusive and sick-defined "purpose of the voter". on the comparable form of ballots, each precinct became making use of a different time-honored. This became considered via the U.S. and the minority of the FLSC (study the minority evaluations on 1st source, commencing at web site 40) to be a gross violation of the equivalent safety Clause, and the U.S. ordered the farcicle recount stopped. whilst the newspapers did a ideal recount, they found that Bush, certainly, did win if the recounts asked via Gore and the Florida ideally suited court docket have been performed. See 2nd source. Now it does say that it could have not been so if there have been an entire statewide recount - yet that became no longer what the U.S. stopped. The recount stopped via the U.S. nonetheless might have led to a Bush victory. So, teach yourselves on the certainty of the subject, somewhat of spreading falsehoods in keeping with irrational hatred of Bush.
2016-12-17 11:18:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
c.
The popular vote was for Al Gore. The Supreme Court stopped the Florida recount giving Floridas electoral college votes to Bush.
2007-02-15 23:17:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by john_stolworthy 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
answerman is S T U pid the president can not be apointed he or she must be elected and it was the supreme court who ordered a recount of the votes in florida and upon recount and carefull srutiny by the court it was announced that g. bush was the new president
2007-02-15 23:14:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by edward m 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Will you be asking this same question after 2008 or will you be in a quandry as to how the dems lost THAT election? The answer to your question is----------he won and it was fair and according to the rules. Get over your hate for GW and his administration and transfer it to the islamic terrorists that want to kill YOU.
2007-02-15 23:33:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by just the facts 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
All the counts in Florida gave him the state and its electoral votes. And that is how we elect presidents in this country. Get over it.
2007-02-15 23:06:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mad Roy 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
C the supreme court, in effect he was appointed never elected.
2007-02-15 23:06:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
the supreme court
he did however win the popular vote hands down!
2007-02-15 23:04:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by jtaylor 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
e) The electoral college, just like it says in the Constitution. You do remember the Constitution, don't you.
2007-02-16 14:35:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
c
2007-02-15 23:13:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋