English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-15 22:27:03 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

battle group cost a few million a day just to be in the area,so soon,but no invasion ,just our famous blasting caps and air power ,,with the missiles. cheers. bushhad

2007-02-15 22:32:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

I choose a militia expert would handle this question. yet provided that i'm sitting right here no longer believing those solutions, i will provide it a shot. in case you have been following militia comments heavily in any respect, you may comprehend that the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have heavily depleted our troop furnish and our weaponry. There are back orders on totally armored Humvees for Iraq that should not be crammed till this summer season. in short we are in no place to invade all people. in certainty, we are extraordinarily weakened and our skill to guard ourselves in case of a considerable militia attack is in question. All this as a consequence of struggling with Iraq and Afghanistan. Iran is not any Iraq or Afghanistan. For starters, get out a map and look at it incredibly perplexing. Iran is greater or less 5 cases the dimensions of Iraq. And Iran has approximately thrice the inhabitants of Iraq. And Iran interestingly does have weapons of mass destruction it would maximum actually use to maintain its existence. To sum up, what's there approximately our journey so a strategies that makes you think of we are in a position and arranged to invade a much greater ambitious enemy than Iraq ever grew to become into? And bombing? did no longer "marvel and awe" prepare the restrictions of that technique? bear in mind: the 1st nighttime of the war we did no longer hit between the accepted objectives we've been going after. Drop nukes? we've international war III on our hands, and we're not waiting for it to any extent further. to no longer point out that each and each physique this would fee greater thousands of billions of greenbacks--ultimately breaking the U.S. economic equipment faster or later. that's a sturdy difficulty that cooler heads are winning someplace.

2016-10-02 05:50:40 · answer #2 · answered by kampfer 3 · 0 0

A high level state department official placed the odds at 30%, but, Iran within the last few days, has been less strident concerning their nuclear program. Lets hope it never comes to this.

2007-02-15 22:33:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Any talk of our invading Iran is purely speculative. There is no proof thet there was ever a plan to invade Iran, and that the Democrats are "wagging the dog" to influence politics so blatantly is pathetic, especially since most people seem to be lacking the clarity of vision to see this. Spin control, my friend. Spin control.

2007-02-15 22:52:23 · answer #4 · answered by sjsosullivan 5 · 4 2

If they become a real threat to America, we will just depopulate the whole country with WMD's. To heck with this mucking around trying help people build a new democratic nation. Kill them all, and let Allah sort out the good ones from the bad. The whole world hates us anyway. At least they might be less inclined to p*ss us off in the future.

2007-02-15 22:54:20 · answer #5 · answered by Mad Roy 6 · 1 1

Never.
The US will use airstrikes to take out nuclear facilities and military targets within the next few months if Iran does not back down to the UN.

The US has no interest in getting involved in another nation building.

2007-02-15 22:30:58 · answer #6 · answered by castlekeepr 4 · 2 2

Just a mater of time. The Gov't already spinning it's story Iran doing Blah Blah Blah. Already used Weapons of Mass destruction, now has to try different story.

2007-02-15 23:02:07 · answer #7 · answered by Adi 2 · 0 2

Tomorrow at 11:51 pm

2007-02-15 23:45:27 · answer #8 · answered by Kye H 4 · 0 2

Well, it's not so much a matter of invading Iran. We're already fighting them in Iraq. That's what the sectarian is about.

2007-02-15 22:46:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

Mar 2, 2007 at 7;00 EST

2007-02-16 00:38:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers