We had a bunch of UN resolutions that forced the situation and we did not act Unilatterally. Our Jets were attacked in the UN mandated "No Fly Zone" We Know it was not because of 9/11 and WMDs was a SMALL part of the reason. Protection of the Kurds ( like when Clinton went to protect the Bosnians) was a large part of it as the UN tends to look down on ethnic Cleansing. So Please stop posting the BS that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 WE KNOW ALREADY!
2007-02-15
22:07:20
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Please read the UN resolutions as they were the Legal method of attack everything else was just speeches. Your limited understanding of the GAME does not mean the goals were moved. You have to read all of it not just want you want. Ignorance of the LAW is no excuse.
2007-02-15
22:23:31 ·
update #1
Found God His Name is Odin and Thor and MAny others thank you.
It is not shifting tales Please read the UN resolutions. If you fail to understand the legal reason for going all YOU are doing IS Believing the lies........
2007-02-15
22:39:50 ·
update #2
And Please believe me as I am Here In uniform In Iraq OIL is part of the Equasion no Question the Free flow of Oil and other world commodities IS American Interest and Yes we fight for that as well.
2007-02-15
22:41:40 ·
update #3
Bingo! You got it!
I am also wondering when they're going to get it thru their thick, elitist heads that we are not at war with the Iraqi people but with an enemy that is trying to destroy their hard earned freedom which has serious consequences throughout the world...
The libs are stuck on this 9/11 thing because of partisanship and their hatred for Bush. They dont give a rat's @$$ about you; they want you to fail because they hate Bush and to me that is the same as saying f-America.
Keep reminding people about the good you are doing and the TRUTH and be safe. TRUTH.
2007-02-15 22:53:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Wow...have you told Bush all this? Does he know? First was weapons of mass destruction....(he's got em...gonna git us!!!"). I am sure I heard that out of Bush's mouth at least 100 times before invasion. Then it was lets give the Iraqis democracy and if they don't want it, we will shove it down their throats. They do NOT want us there. Let's see, we have protected 655,000 by giving them death. We went into Iraq under a web of lies by the Bush administration. Iraq did not attack the USA, they were not part of the 9/11 tragedy. We went in there because of Bush's personal vendetta and no other reason except greed for oil. If you believe all that you wrote above, then you are as delusional as Bush supporters. Most of this country is opposed to this war now. Now my question would be....whose interests is Bush protecting? The will of the people or his own reckless behavior? This man is the epitome of incompetence and people are dying because of it.
2007-02-16 00:46:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by kolacat17 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
What? Iraq attack US, in case you realy p.c. to comprehend i'm uncertain that even Binladan attack US yet i'm specific approximately some difficulty, the use military discovered no unlawful wepons in Iraq, and sth else interior the war between Iran and Iraq the u . s . a . and Engalnd sent unlawful wepons for Sadam mutually with poisonous wepons. If there have been any wepons present day in Iraq it surly grew to become into from the U. S.. Unfortunatly.
2016-10-02 05:50:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by kampfer 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just how many times are you wingnuts going to shift the goalposts on this one? We all remember: you went into Iraq to get rid of the WMDs and because Bush said - there is FILM of him saying this, you can't deny it - that there were proven links between Saddam and al-Qaeda. The WMDs weren't there and there were no links whatever between Saddam and al-Qaeda. Bush screwed up.
The Kurds were being gassed in the 1980s, and the Americans, British and Germans merrily sold Saddam the equipment with which to do it. No one in the Western govts gave a damn about the Kurds until their plight began to function as a useful political excuse in 2002.
2007-02-15 22:13:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Saint Bee 4
·
5⤊
1⤋
The rationale for the war has been posted on governmental websites that pre-date the invasion and WMDs are just one of many reasons. The bottom line is that Saddam drew first blood when he invaded our ally Kuwait. Had he complied with the terms of peace from that war, the United States would have never resumed the hostilities Iraq started.
2007-02-15 22:45:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It was Goerge W. Bush's personal revenge nothing more. He had a thing against Saddam. Yeah, like American Jets were ever in danger when they got shot with the stuff Iraqis had. Bunch of propaganda. It was just for show. Yeah right I'll ever buy that B.S that bush was actually trying to help anybody. Just about himself and his little friends in Weapons and Petroleom Companies trying to make some quick bucks.
Anybody dumb enough to believe what bush says, has obviously been brainwashed by his big lies. A page out of Hitlers book. The Bigger the lie, the more people will fall for it.
2007-02-15 22:15:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by PsyChoPath 3
·
6⤊
1⤋
Whatever history has been rewritten to try and salvage support does not concern me. The people of the USA were led to believe that Iraq had Nuclear weapons and they were going to use them to kill us. Then, when that proved to be a lie, Iraq was all the sudden a safe haven for the CIA invented Al-Qaeda.
WAR is profitable and the prize is Oil and, let's not forget, total control over the population through FEAR.
2007-02-15 22:36:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by sirdoctorfine 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
You will never get Libs to believe that Pres. Bush did anything for the right reason, they are blinded by hate. We should have invaded Iraq when we learned they sponsored an attempted assassination of Pres. George H. W. Bush, instead Clinton who was president at the time did noting more than shoot a cruise missile into a neighborhood that may or may not have had anything to do with it.
2007-02-15 22:19:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jayson Kane 7
·
0⤊
4⤋
You should inform the president. He said we went to war because of the terrorists, then he said it was because they had WMD, then he said mission accomplished. You must be one of his immoral millionaires, making money off of our dead and wounded troops or just an air head.
2007-02-15 23:23:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by jackie 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
How many times are the reasons for illegal war going to change?
So what your telling me by this question is that americans attacked, occupied, and subjugated Iraqi oil fields because our jet were attacked? That is big time BS. you saw shock and awe like all the rest of us? Hussein avoided all the ploys to get involved in another war. he was trying to maintain power not lose it. yet we attacked him in spite of his unwillingness to play shoot the spy plane down to start world war 3 .
What planet are you living on? why do you go along with the constantly changing lies being told to you? before you go calling me a socialist liberal, let me save you the trouble. I'm a US VET who was fooled just like the rest of america. I was a bush supporter.
People like you are a dread to life on earth. you would spread lies and mislead. It truly is unamerican to support this tyrannical regime that bush has set up in america. and I blame democrats just as much.
It's time to wake up america! Find the one true God.
2007-02-15 22:27:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋