is there anyone who can take wimbledon away from him ????
2007-02-15 21:54:03 · 13 answers · asked by yuvi 1 in Sports ➔ Tennis
At this point in his career, the only person who can beat Roger Federer is Federer himself (and Nadal on clay but that's not the point). We may have to wait for a new generation of players to come in before Roger Federer will be dethroned and have Wimbledon taken from him. Although, by that time, he would have reset all the winning records. I predict at least 20 majors.
2007-02-16 02:45:56 · answer #1 · answered by trombass08 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Roger Federer era does not have any threat for the next 2-3 years... some new player should emerge like Nadal.... this new generation player can only snatch Wimbledon from him and can Don the court for few next years.... Recall the history how Borish Becker has born in the Wimbledon.....Best Of Luck!
2007-02-15 22:51:54 · answer #2 · answered by an_and7 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Till he's got Tony Rochus as his coach. They make an unbeatable team.
I've heard that Rochus gives him a punishing fitness workout to keep him at the top of his game.
And the dream of beating Rafa on clay keeps his motivation up.
As for Wimbledon, I doubt anyone can take it from him. His game and racket are both adapted the most to grass surfaces.
2007-02-16 00:59:57 · answer #3 · answered by Nishaant 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
u must know it . the era will continue until he doesnt get tired winning all those trophies . it is almost impossible to defeat him except nadal in clay court .
but i think nadal is maturing now .
in future he may be a threat , but who knows the future ??!!
2007-02-15 22:04:32 · answer #4 · answered by saqib z 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
at least two years before he loses total dominance, barring injury. Maybe up to 6 years, this guy is the best ever!!!! Nobody can take wibledon from him for at least 3 years barring injury.
2007-02-16 01:46:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
perhaps a few more years, and the decline will set in.
we saw that with the likes of sampras, becker, agassi, mcenroe, connors, etc.
it's more of federer losing the title rather someone taking it away from him... and whoever beats him at his peak will definitely be federer's heir apparent.
2007-02-15 22:57:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'd hate to say it but right now their is no one Pete Sampras was right he is in a league of his own right now. The crazy thing is he is getting better with no one to compete with and that is crazy. He is competeing with himself to surpass old limits
2007-02-15 21:59:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
his reign is over bcoz nadal is going to take him over by the end of 2008 french open
2007-02-16 02:45:20 · answer #8 · answered by nagesh1293 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
may be till 2009 feb... federer will have to face a huge injury that will threaten his carreer....
2007-02-15 22:11:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
well....he is the best!!! till he can play and defeat everyone he will continue!!
2007-02-16 02:01:32 · answer #10 · answered by sritama starz 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋