English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If you had to allocate resources, which location would have a greater effect on the world, or the USA??

2007-02-15 20:06:10 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

7 answers

I think all the borders are inportant don't u want peace

2007-02-15 20:11:31 · answer #1 · answered by glow 2 · 0 0

US border is more important, but I doubt either Canada or Mexico are willing to invade us, despite all the Illegal immigrants boasting on this site. Troops in Iraq will have more of an impact, for good or bad. It would anger the Muslim world even more and might generate more terrorist. On the other hand staying there would show strength and cause the existing fanatics to relocate their resources closer to home.

2007-02-16 04:40:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Iraq's border problems are wth Syria and Iran.

The United States' border problems are with the Congress in Washington, DC.

2007-02-16 04:16:15 · answer #3 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 0 0

what came first the chicken or the egg? to we protect ourselves at our front gate or do we go across the street and make sure i crazy neighbor doesn't start shooting at us?

2007-02-16 04:15:45 · answer #4 · answered by David M 3 · 0 0

I guess it depends on which country you live in

2007-02-16 04:14:38 · answer #5 · answered by Rachel 7 · 0 0

USA's boarders are more important, close them, or we lose are country.....

2007-02-16 04:42:57 · answer #6 · answered by bodie 3 · 0 0

ours of course.

2007-02-17 02:13:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers