2007-02-15 19:41:35 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
no way, thats too quick for a game, not enough time to bowl a whole team out, not enough overs for batsmen to make 100s. and that what makes cricket, 50 overs is perfect...
powerplays are dumb tho
2007-02-15 19:45:51 · answer #1 · answered by c_u_at_thebitterend 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes cricket matches should reduce to 20 overs because it it takes a lot of time for the match to over many people just watch the first 10 overs and then they direct watch the last 10 overs i think this rule should be allowed.
2007-02-16 03:52:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In 20 Over match There will be only sixes and fours.And no techniques will be existing,since players will be trying to hit hard rather than playing with the technique.In 20 over match even a person who doesnt know how to bat can play well,and there will be no natural talent.Any way its is very exciting watching a 20 over match,but to watch a real players play you need to watch ODI and Test match,Tough guy.
2007-02-16 03:51:25 · answer #3 · answered by Krazykid 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it's not interesting. Even the batsman/bowler can not prove their mettle and the standard of the game may fall down. The correct one is Test Match and next to enjoy a day, 50 over match is perfect.
2007-02-16 03:49:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The reduced version desired by is already in vogue. But that will not flourish for long. Test matches and ODI (50 overs) are the best formats.
2007-02-16 06:19:26 · answer #5 · answered by Freddie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A Big No !!!
50 overs are Okay !! atleast one can watch some cricket in 50 overs!
2007-02-16 14:43:39 · answer #6 · answered by ★Roshni★ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes sure 20 overs match for entertainment , 50 overs match has an unpredicted results sometime.
2007-02-16 04:20:16 · answer #7 · answered by sidh 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
never....... because if it comes to 20 overs the fans of cricket in the world will have no interest to watch the game......
there will be no profit for the sponcers,
even the players will have no interest to play there will not be a tuff competitision between the teams......
2007-02-16 04:20:15 · answer #8 · answered by rechi n 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nooo way ..... cricket would lose itz originality ..... n then 20 over game are jus for fun it becomes a slog game and only a show of batsem not of bowlers .... i think 50 overs is best .. if you cant watch 50 overs , then better switch off your TV sets ...
2007-02-16 04:07:12 · answer #9 · answered by yuvi 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, 50 over matches are much enjoyed in this condition.
2007-02-16 03:44:05 · answer #10 · answered by Expression 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋