Why can't we all find a solution to these problems with reason and intellect, instead of hate and petty feuds.
2007-02-15 19:07:14 · 8 answers · asked by Dustbowl Blues 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
If people would just take the time to sit and think about their actions. The violent ones are usually the ones that have no communication skills. Maybe a little unintelligent and to get themselves noticed, they resort to violence or sheer nastiness.
2007-02-15 19:13:40 · answer #1 · answered by looby 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think maybe some people are like that just because they need a target. I was bullied for 5 years and the main thing is that she couldn't put her anger anywhere else. I also think that some people ( Not putting a spotlight on them) just jump to conclusions. They say, " Oh, No one else will fix this so I might as well fix it myself." That is a bad way to put it. I think that if you believe you can fix a problem with reason and intellect you can, but if you don't all that anger stirring inside of you is going to come out. I learned that in a bad way. I kept holding and holding anger in and then I just blew up. So, if you come to a problem and you can't fix it yourself, then find someone who will help you.
2007-02-16 01:22:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
whilst in comparison with the scores of dying threats Limbaugh, Hannity, and Beck receive on a every day foundation i might say the "tea baggers" are not even on the element of behaving such as you libs. take a seem decrease back in easy terms some years in the past at how a lot of human beings have been celebrating our president being attacked in Iraq. whether, in view that he become a republican, there become no longer something incorrect with that. i'm no longer justifying the two element, i'm in basic terms asserting, do no longer act all shocked and indignant whilst one element starts doing what the different has been doing for years.
2016-09-29 04:42:57 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To be honest it can be a case of frustration. Someone feels frustrated to the point that they can not articulate their emotions towards something or someone in their lives so violence is the only way for them. There are so many variations of this principle that I am in no position to judge. Although opposed to violence as any form of solution to a problem. I can understand sometimes how people can feel that violence is the only way to articulate their feelings. To cite an example, imagine a close relative is killed in a merciless and pointless way and then the perpetrators of this crime were not only walking the streets but 'boasting' of what they had done and dragging your relatives name through the mud. The police and authorities wouldn't touch them. How would that make you feel? How would you articulate your feelings towards those people? Sometime you might just feel articulation in the form of words falls a little short......
2007-02-15 19:25:55 · answer #4 · answered by waggy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because talking & diplomacy means that you have to think about what you say, think about how you are saying it, do some research on your oponent and kep things civilised. That required tact and some form of inelligence. In other words: talking and diploacy to sole issues requires lots of energy.
Violence is easier, as you dont need to think, only strike.
2007-02-15 19:15:32 · answer #5 · answered by MM 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Our instinctual response to conflict is to either avoid it or respond with like force. We are sentient and can behave in ways our instincts didn't think of, but many people are ruled by their primal nature and lack the ability of thinking outside of their gut reactions. We are animals.
2007-02-15 19:13:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's ignorance.
2007-02-15 19:22:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is a choice and a matter of cultural and political beliefs.
2007-02-15 19:10:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋