was it morally correct ,who decide?
2007-02-15 15:55:17 · 8 answers · asked by genie 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
GOD will have the FINAL say on the matter. On that you can rely.
2007-02-15 16:14:00 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. US of A, Baby! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The families went through enough legal battles in court to make the ultimate decision "legal" by law. Morally however, no one can say for sure. Personally I think Terry was killed in a very inhumane way. She was left to starve to death...it's terrible what they did to her.
2007-02-15 23:59:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The decisions about and for Terry Schiavo should have been left to her husband. Morality doesn't enter into the equation.
And, yes, it was legal.
2007-02-16 00:17:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whether it was legal or morally correct are two different things. The law is black and white(of course it gets circumvented all the time) whereas morally correct is a matter of whose morals you are referring to.
2007-02-15 23:59:39 · answer #4 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was a fight between her husband and her parents. It was the kind of legal/medical argument that probate courts have to deal with when a person is disabled without leaving clear written instructions. For Congress to pimp itself to the perceived desires of the religious right by interjecting itself into that process was wrong. A true conservative, one who believes in a limited federal government, was appalled by Congress' lack of integrity.
2007-02-16 04:12:43 · answer #5 · answered by mattapan26 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes and yes. The court decided because the family could not agree.
2007-02-15 23:58:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Though I disagree with the court and the husband, I believe it was legal.
2007-02-16 00:02:00 · answer #7 · answered by acesfourpal 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
her husband
2007-02-15 23:58:28 · answer #8 · answered by I want u2 hit me as hardas u can 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋