What's more important for female singers - looks or talent?

Question

When it comes to female vocalists having a successful career, what is more important - looks or talent? What will sell more CDs - singing talent, or a pretty face and nice figure that look good in the video and on the album cover?

Answer 1

Sad to say, it's looks. People want something interesting. It used to be voice before MTV came out in the 80's, but since then, music is all about how you look. Technology can make you sound good, and it's much cheaper and faster than plastic surgery.

Answer 2

What a sad question. It has come to this? Are you kidding? Talent is the only thing of value. Sales of CD's are not important and anyone with talent (Tony Bennett, Sinatra, Streisand, etc.) will not acknowledge such. Talent always comes to the surface and survives and lasts. Take Janet Jackson. She has a thin voice of no real quality but she looks great in the videos. She is a performance artist, not a singer. Whitney Houston just happens to have been gorgeous and blessed with a great set of pipes but she self destructed and we will probably never know the best of her vocal talent as a result.
Successful career? Like Britney Spears? She came up because of her cute and then sexy look but she can't sing and so her lasting is not in the stars. If you got the talent you will have a successful career because those with the stuff do not count album and video sales. No talents HAVE to count the sales and it isn't because they can sing, it is because they have nice fake **** and a scrumptious rear end, etc. Anna Nicole Smith was gorgeous but had no talent. She could endure only as long as her beauty was in full bloom. Had she lived to 50 she would have been a has-been.

Answer 3

Talent obviously. Very few artists, if they may be called that, without talent have any longevity in their careers.

If you like to look at pretty girls buy a porno mag. If you want to listen to decent music you won't give a **** what the person singing it sounds like. And in time, it will be those with talent that are remembered and praised for their brilliance. Janis Joplin, Joni Mitchell, Sandy Denny, Aretha Franklin. Popular music does not stay popular forever. But brilliance remains the same.

Answer 4

in case you think of Dusty and Aretha does no longer get contracts in the present day you at the instant are not paying interest. I even have under no circumstances considered any of those cutting-element British woman 'soul' singers that get trotted out each and every 3 hundred and sixty 5 days or so on the pole. think of Adele, Duffy, etc... ---------- Adele, Duffy, etc are pop stars yet this might properly be a distinctive count number. whilst have there ever been extensive suitable 40 pop stars in the vein you advise who extremely have been obese or unattractive? Off the dazzling of my head, all I have been given is Mama Cass for the former and Janis Joplin for the latter. yet who else? it is not like Dusty and Aretha have been fat gruesome cows. looks/intercourse attraction and pa hits have long gone hand in hand for particularly a mutually as now. in certainty i think of your question could in basic terms as extremely have been asked at any time in the final 50 years (come to think of of it, it become given my mothers and fathers feedback approximately Madonna and god is familiar with what my mothers and fathers mothers and fathers concept-approximately human beings like Marianne dedicated).

Answer 5

talent is more important in my eyes. but to have a successful career they apparantly need the looks and can suck at the talent part and still be a star.

Answer 6

Talent is more important. Without it, you are not going to get anyone who wants to listen to your music, or buy it. Lots can be done with hair and makeup to transform a singer into a "star."

Answer 7

Looks , man! Nobody cares about talent , it's the look - gotta look pretty (read: Whoreish) and you gotta cause controversy and get in tabloids and stuff like that. That's what makes a popstar today! ...though i admit my answer is sarcastic and "toungue in cheek" , i'm disgusted that what i've said is mostly true.

Answer 8

depends on the type of music. if it is the pop stuff, and the artist would be on like MTV, a nice body would go far. but if its only heard on the radio, talent would do it.

Answer 9

When I look for music, I look for talent. I know a lot of ugly people in the music busniess like ne-yo [no offence to his fans]... but Iisten to there music & go to there concerts anyway...

Answer 10

Both