Prior to running for president, should one be tested on ability, knowledge and awareness of world and domestic affairs in all areas a president is required to make decisions about?
2007-02-15 15:02:09 · 15 answers · asked by Earthy 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Only democrates!
2007-02-15 15:07:59 · answer #1 · answered by Sgt 524 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Air stress. That grew to become into the least perplexing question ever. existence isn't paradise notwithstanding it is far greater ideal than those of the different branches. additionally, distinctive careers interior the Air stress are in call for on the exterior once you p.c. to get out. For those motives the different branches are jealous and contact us interior the Air stress lazy or "chair stress" yet in all honesty we serve a minimum of as tremendous a objective because of the fact the different branches (and in lots of procedures a bigger objective). many human beings are asserting Coast shelter (this is particularly risky, I even have 2 buddies interior the Coast shelter) and the nationwide shelter (I also have a pal there too and she or he's been deployed greater desirable than I even have interior the Air stress) yet i'm assuming they are uninformed. Do your examine. confer with human beings in each and each branch. no longer in basic terms the recruiter or listening to stereotypes from the uninformed. undergo in recommendations that existence interior the protection stress would be perplexing and you will deployed no remember the branch yet take it from me: circulate Air stress. It grew to become into the main suitable determination of my existence arms down.
2016-12-17 17:20:03 · answer #2 · answered by morrell 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who would be the judge? We already have a system to elect presidents and a minimum requirement as set out in the Constitution!
Why do people always want to screw with the US Constitution!
Conservatives know squat! That's why they are conservative. The only thing they know is the location of their pocketbook!
2007-02-15 15:06:45 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Each voter can & should make such determinations. If you are a citizen over 18 & not a convicted felon, you may use any criteria you want to.
2007-02-15 15:09:50 · answer #4 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you will require a bipartisan group to assemble and administer the tests, where do you propose to get enough democrats that have the intelligence to assemble and administer these tests?
2007-02-15 15:07:29 · answer #5 · answered by just the facts 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes, they should. They should also have pyschological exams and have to take random hair follicle drug tests at least once per month.
2007-02-15 15:05:53 · answer #6 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
An IQ test would be good.
Tropical Weasel is exactly wrong. The more intelligent a person the more likely they are to be liberal.
2007-02-15 15:06:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
GW thought Africa was a country. I'm sure some Pro-Bush choads
will post "well, it is a country, isn't it?"
2007-02-15 15:07:47 · answer #8 · answered by eyeavenger 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
That's crazy!!!!!! The people voting for them should be tested!!!!! If we had that in place when y'all voted for Bush....we wouldn't be in this mess!!!!!!!
2007-02-15 15:22:16 · answer #9 · answered by meemadee2000 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes,
If we would have had that in place 6 years ago.......wow I couldn't even begin to wonder how much better of the American people would be.
2007-02-15 15:05:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋