English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

can some one be my hero and plzz explain what this is in complete detail

2007-02-15 14:27:46 · 7 answers · asked by monica b 1 in Science & Mathematics Other - Science

7 answers

People like Randy G. and Martin C. wish to present you with a " controversy ". They do not wish to present any real evidence, though. They do not mention that they could not get into a peer reviewed journal, even with bribery. There refutations of evolutionary theory are ludicrous and easily turned back. They also fail to mention their recent legal defeats. There irreducible complexity arguments are merely " god of the gap " arguments. Go here for further information.

http://www.talkorigins.org

PS Martin C.. Even inanimate clays and crystals have quantifiable patterns of replication. Biological systems could not do that? But they did. Simple ID mistake; the confusion between digital and analogue informational systems. You statistical analysis needs work, also.

2007-02-15 15:38:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The theory of intelligent design (ID) holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause rather than an undirected process such as natural selection. ID is thus a scientific disagreement with the core claim of evolutionary theory that the apparent design of living systems is an illusion.

In a broader sense, Intelligent Design is simply the science of design detection -- how to recognize patterns arranged by an intelligent cause for a purpose. Design detection is used in a number of scientific fields, including anthropology, forensic sciences that seek to explain the cause of events such as a death or fire, cryptanalysis and the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI). An inference that certain biological information may be the product of an intelligent cause can be tested or evaluated in the same manner as scientists daily test for design in other sciences.

ID is controversial because of the implications of its evidence, rather than the significant weight of its evidence. ID proponents believe science should be conducted objectively, without regard to the implications of its findings. This is particularly necessary in origins science because of its historical (and thus very subjective) nature, and because it is a science that unavoidably impacts religion.






Positive evidence of design in living systems consists of the semantic, meaningful or functional nature of biological information, the lack of any known law that can explain the sequence of symbols that carry the "messages," and statistical and experimental evidence that tends to rule out chance as a plausible explanation. Other evidence challenges the adequacy of natural or material causes to explain both the origin and diversity of life.



Intelligent Design is an intellectual movement that includes a scientific research program for investigating intelligent causes and that challenges naturalistic explanations of origins which currently drive science education and research.

2007-02-15 23:08:45 · answer #2 · answered by Martin C 1 · 0 2

It is the belief that a higher power created life, and it holds that the science behind life is too complex too have happened without interference from a higher power (aka God).

Of course, ID is has been recently overthrown even in Kansas, where ID proponents are the strongest, due to its basis on religion rather than science.

2007-02-15 22:35:22 · answer #3 · answered by doctorevil64 4 · 3 0

Someting sat somewhere,got board and decided to set up an amusement park.
He womped up a universe and all of us,because he knew that it just wouldn't happen by chance.
Just an illustration we are the product of a naturally evolving universe.

2007-02-16 11:21:43 · answer #4 · answered by Billy Butthead 7 · 1 0

It is a question relating to religion, a belief system based on a creation myth, and as such, has no place in a scientific forum, like this one.

2007-02-15 23:10:57 · answer #5 · answered by CLICKHEREx 5 · 1 0

it is a fictional account of the origin of the earth by people that don't believe in science

2007-02-17 22:53:00 · answer #6 · answered by phyteacher 2 · 0 0

Try this website:

2007-02-15 22:53:41 · answer #7 · answered by Randy G 7 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers