(in honor of the 911)
2007-02-15 13:34:57 · 17 answers · asked by Super Swami 2008 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
i love the rams so i'm going to buy into the whole conspiracy theroy. Yes, Bush made them win.
2007-02-15 13:47:06 · answer #1 · answered by Wham 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Don't think so...someone would have already reveal any discreet data...Just think about all the people involved...remember that there is alwayz a black sheep in the crowd...I do believe it is a mere coincidence for the Pats winning SB 36...if it were a set up by the government or the NFL, then the 2 other following wins against the Panthers and Eagles must also have been set ups...there is no way it could possibly been made...The Pats earned their victories on there own.
2007-02-15 16:44:35 · answer #2 · answered by esnagui 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Both Team have great offenses (Pats are the better of the two here), But the Giants have a much better Defense who has found its groove at the right time. The Pats faced a great defense against Baltimore but have been playing comfortably at home where they are much better versus being on the road. The Giants are road warriors who had a much harder road to get to the Superbowl going against Green Bay and San Fran where both games were on the road. Eli and the Giants have been playing must win Football since they faced the Jets, and had to beat talented teams such as Cowboys and Falcons, just to play the 15-1 Green Bay Packers at home. The Giants beat a team with a better offense them they have, and now they just beat a team with a better defense that they had. I hate admitting it, because I think the Giants play their best as underdogs but Giants have an offense that can keep up with Pats, but they also have a Defense that can get to Brady. Giants win by a field goal.
2016-05-24 05:24:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately the Patriots won fair and square. Well, OK. So maybe the Rams helped them out a bit by having a really bad day on the field.
2007-02-16 05:28:35 · answer #4 · answered by ladydi_1987 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This question is stupid! The patriots unfortunantly won because they played better than the rams! Stop trying to make something out of nothing!
2007-02-16 03:23:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, the NFL did by screwing the Raiders with the Tom Brady tuck rule. Tom Brady is no Joe Montana. Montana threw touchdowns. All Brady can do is get in field goal range. He couldn't lead the team to a touchdown when needed agains the Colts.
2007-02-15 13:40:25 · answer #6 · answered by The Big Shot 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Im a rams fan so yeah and they made a rule up for the patriot game. Tom Bradys a fag
2007-02-15 14:57:20 · answer #7 · answered by Tom B 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
you cannot be serious. the rams played horrible and as the patriots have showed in the past 5 seasons, it was no fluke. tom brady is possibly the best clutch quarterback ever and adam vintieri is straight up the best kicker to ever play the game
2007-02-15 14:30:02 · answer #8 · answered by jesus 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, Bush made them win Superbowl 36. He also made them win Superbowls 38 and 39. No, wait! That wasn't George Bush - it was Bill Belichick. Morons...
2007-02-16 16:14:24 · answer #9 · answered by Dave L 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ummm...NO. Wouldn't it make more sense for either the Giants, Jets, or Redskins to win...after all, their respective cities were the ones affected most by the terrorist attacks.
2007-02-16 02:00:21 · answer #10 · answered by RichMac82 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
lol no the government doesn't care about nfl football rasing the moral of its citiziens and yes that was a fumble but you don't win three out of four sb's without getting at least one Bull Sh*it play
2007-02-17 03:02:26 · answer #11 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋