I say NO NO NO it is SOOOO obvious that Anna Nicole was not wanted in life by her biological "family" early on and she was ESTRANGED from all of them INCLUDING her "mother" FOR YEARS and it was also so obvious the LOVE Anna had for Daniel her late son. Anna would MORE THAN ANYTHING want to be buried with Daniel and that her "mother" should back OFF she has NO RIGHT to even have her argument HEARD and everyone should respectfully SHUT THE HELL UP and Anna should be RESPECTFULLY laid to rest with her son Daniel
2007-02-15 13:30:22 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
This is the most vulgar display I have ever seen of disrespect and vulturism of the dead
2007-02-15 13:31:08 · update #1
remember this when you put off making out your own will.
2007-02-15 13:38:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think her husband has the right to decide where she is buried, but just because she and her immediate family had some problems, don't count out distant relatives that may have genuinely loved her. I'm sure that they would want her buried with the rest of the family. Having said that, though, if she had Daniel buried away from the family, she is entitled to the same respect. I think it would be awful to have a court decide something that should be a family's duty.
2007-02-15 13:43:15 · answer #2 · answered by ripcurt 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is all so 'poor Anna Nicole', I doubt she would want that. She should be buried next to her son. The courts should do an immediate paternity test as it is obvious that two of the men want to be the baby's father for the right reason, love. Any money the baby would get should be put in trust until she is twenty five and IF Howard Stern is the father, he should NOT get the money if the baby dies. Her sons death and hers are too unusual. Unless that baby is her deceased husbands child, no money from his estate should go to her now that Anna is dead. It should go back to his children. period.
2007-02-15 13:42:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I agree. She should be burried next to her son. It is so obvious that she was estranged from her family. I watched her mother on a talk show before Anna Nicole died and her mother and aunt acted like poor white trash wanting their 15 minutes of fame.
I hate that Stern Moron. I think he had something to do with her death and that of her son.
*but that's just my opinion and opinions are like *ssholes, everyone has one.
2007-02-15 13:41:53 · answer #4 · answered by Moma 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
clearly Howard K. Stern should not be considered to be the "companion" he would like us to believe, because she felt free enough to have relations with 3 other men we know of. so that would nullify his exclusivisty. there is another reason he wants her body there. in the 5 months after the baby was born, he never paid child support. that would seem to me that he really does not have a claim. i think that Anna Nicole should be buried where she tried at least to make a home and since she is a Bahamian citizen she should be buried there.
2007-02-15 13:39:38 · answer #5 · answered by karakittle 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. If Anna wanted to be buried in Mexia she would have bought cemetary plots there. I live less than 15 miles from there, and I think it is a SHAME how her mother is acting. If Anna Nicole wasn't rich that woman would not give a damn about where she was buried.
2007-02-15 13:36:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
No if the judge knew anything he would know Anna hater her.
He should allow her to be buried in the Bahama's beacause obviously everyone knows how much she loved him and that is what she wanted
I 100% agree with you
2007-02-15 13:33:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't understand this incessant fascination people are having with Anna Nicole. Aren't there real problems, like homelessness, that we can focus on?
Good lord, if we spent have the time on charity work that we do on celebrities lives, or lack of them, the world would be fantastic.
2007-02-15 13:33:26 · answer #8 · answered by Kiss My Shaz 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
no...she should be buried by her own child. The mother is all about the publicity and thinks maybe their is gonna be a windfall of money coming her way.
2007-02-15 14:05:53 · answer #9 · answered by rosey 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think in death, for anybody, the respectful thing to do is abide by their wishes and or do for them what you believed they would want. In this case I feel it would be right to lay her to rest with her child. Mothers never want to be parted from their children.
2007-02-15 14:05:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well if she was estranged from her family then I don't think her family should have that right. Smith wouldn't have wanted that.
2007-02-15 13:38:49 · answer #11 · answered by ღღღ 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋