Wesley Clark because last time he ran as a moderate democrat, unlike the other two candidates. He als served in the military, an added bonus.
2007-02-15 13:31:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by starfish 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's not Hilary Clinton. It's not Barrack Obama, and it's certainly not Wesley Clark. Personally I'd rather have John Edwards, even though I'm a republican.
2007-02-15 22:18:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
BARRACK OBAMA,are you insane? Sounds like Bin Laden to me. This country is not ready for a black president. As much as a racist as I am NOT, it is true, the republicans (white population) is not going to elect a black president. I've never heard of Wesley Clark in my life. Who is he anyway? Must be the senator for Guam. I would vote for Hilary Clinton based on the fact that she is a woman alone. But, unfortunately, to my reality, she's not getting elected either because she is a woman. It's called another republican president for the next election year.
2007-02-15 21:32:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
If it's from those 3, Wes Clark. He's the only one of the group with half a brain and isn't out to turn the US into a socialist cesspool. He would probably know how to finish the war in Iraq with a victory rather than cutting and running like the other two.
2007-02-15 21:41:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mr. Pibb 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I wasn't wasting my vote it would go to Wesley Clark. If he would get some more publicity he could be a very serious candidate. Hes not going to get attention however, so I would have to go with Barack Obama. Hillary is out because the more she tries to downplay her vote on Iraq the more I don't like her.
2007-02-15 21:44:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
barrack Obama, because he is the least tainted of the bunch and could actually make a difference if elected. He has fewer people to pay back and has fresh ideas. As a black American he can help to turn around the blacks in America that have been given a bum wrap over the years, free them from jails where many have been sent for sentences involving drug offences that really were the only ways for them to earn money at all. Given jobs and a second chance in society is all that many in America need right now, but with a President lacking in new ideas the same old same old is all you will get with anyone else. Barrack Obama may be America's only hope for redemption but beware the jealous others who may try to lure him this way or that just to see him out of the race. Like he told 60 Minutes, he can wait to become President but can the country wait for him to become President in 10 years time? Will there be anything left for him to be President of? America needs a common man to become their leader, a man who puts America ahead of himself, ahead of his name, ahead of his backers, America needs a man like Barrack Obama now, not ten years from now, but in 2008 before it is too late. It is up to you to find out as much as you can about any new leader and decide if you want to help make a change in what could be the ultimate change. Ultimate because if it doesn't work this time, there may be no turning it around, all that remains will only be viewed in a mirror or what used to be. Every great nation in the world had a turning point, but when we look back in that mirror most of them were turning points that led to their demise. What is in store for America in the future, another oil man, another movie man, or a common man with common sense? It is a choice you will have to make, thanks for the question, I look forward to the results.
2007-02-15 21:39:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mr. PDQ 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hillary Clinton: She has eight years as indirect presidential experience; she also was the First Lady of Arkansas, when Bill was governor.
She also showed herself to be Ex-President Clinton's driving force; the woman behind the man.
Obama has charisma and youth; but little experience.
Clark is a stud; but he has no executive branch experience.
Why did not you include Al Gore in your question?
2007-02-15 21:30:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by MenifeeManiac 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
If I must choose one of them I'm going to go with 3) Hillary Clinton. I would love to see this country run by a woman.
2007-02-15 21:48:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by GO HILLARY 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I would not vote unless you add Condoleezza Rice then I have a reason to vote. I am white male but that doesn’t matter and Condoleezza Rice is black and a women and that doesn’t matter, what matters is that she is the best person for the job out of all the political idiots out there. She understands what it takes to keep peace and to enforce peace. She understand that when you have talked till your blue in the face and the other guy still wants to kill you that you kill him first. All in all she is smarter than any one of the others that are planning to run, I wish she would run.
2007-02-15 21:35:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Johnny 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Joe Lieberman - a man who has proven that he speaks with conviction and honesty, without first checking to see what everyone is saying.
That would be a refreshing change, don't you agree?
2007-02-15 21:50:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
0⤊
0⤋