2007-02-15 12:13:42 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Yes without a doubt. Especially if Gore takes a strong stand against those voted to go war with Iraq and offers an exit strategy. I think Americans (for the most part) enjoyed Bill Clinton's Presidency. We had the largest growth in our economy in history, largest drop in proverty in nearly 40 years, highest homeownership and job creation on record, and lowest inflation and unemployment rate since the 1960s. The Democratic Party is looking for a candidate that is the closest semblance to Bill Clinton (without the horny unfaithful gene). Presently, that is Hillary because she is married to the guy. But if you had to chose the wife who hung around the guy and the man who worked with the guy to create a strong Presidency, who would you choose?
2007-02-15 14:38:12 · answer #1 · answered by GL Supreme 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Hillary has just as much celebrity status as Al Gore. Plus Gore isn't even running for president.
2007-02-15 12:22:51 · answer #2 · answered by Surely Funke 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
perhaps, yet he has greater effective issues to do along with his existence than attempt to run a rustic the place human beings hate him for telling the certainty. As for the whole claiming he invented the internet element, the two Vint Cerf and Bob Kahn have reported: "we don't think of, as some human beings have argued, that Gore meant to declare he 'invented' the internet. apart from, there isn't any question in our minds that on a similar time as serving as Senator, Gore's initiatives had an significant and valuable result on the nonetheless-evolving cyber web." So drop it, they invented the internet and he helped them out, end of tale.
2016-12-17 11:00:05 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't like Gorey Al or Mrs. Clinton, but I don't think Al Gore could beat Hillary Duff at this point.
2007-02-15 12:17:42 · answer #4 · answered by Kat 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The last time Al Gore ran his constituents were so dumb they couldn't read a simple ballot and believe they voted for Buchanan instead.
2007-02-15 12:44:26 · answer #5 · answered by pretender59321 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Al Gore wouldn't have to explain a vote on this war, so I guess its possible.
2007-02-15 12:31:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he had his chance and was too anal to gain the people's trust. Hillary is only a good candidate for pres. because she's a woman - she's totally wishy washy on almost every issue presented. She also has a dark and evil background if anyone takes the time to look any of it up.
2007-02-15 12:19:32 · answer #7 · answered by Decoy Duck 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would vote for Gore. I think he's much more personable and more ppl would be willing to vote for him then Hilary.
2007-02-15 12:21:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think Hilary but i prefer al gore .
2007-02-15 12:42:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Hillary has a better chance. Funny to see if they'd sling mud at each other!
2007-02-15 12:16:52 · answer #10 · answered by Celeste P 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋