2007-02-15 11:11:31 · 12 answers · asked by Sean 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDvVZ2Gn-9g
2007-02-15 11:14:04 · update #1
Ive brought that up in the past.
I remember that exchange exactly....saudi arabian government offered it clearly during a White House interview to Fliecsher, and no one from bush administration ever responded.
Republicans usually change the subject or say saudi wanted to much in exchange.
But its all just another reason why this administration choices and failures have shown why we shouldnt follow anythign he says.
Listen to him.
Since when does a president not want to answer questions on a topic unless he has somethign to hide?
He didnt answer anything on the Libby trial, instead tried and failed to be funny.
Its all changing. Thats the only consolation I have, when hearing all this absurd debates and all the idiots here on this message board trying to defend complete failures, complete neglection, that could HAVE PREVENTED 9/11
The democrats are going to clean house now, and all the republicans are going to be able to do is complain complain complain like luittle kids when they had 6 whole years to do something - but didnt want to
2007-02-15 11:24:51 · answer #1 · answered by writersbIock2006 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
lol because it never happened. I know of at least two times Osama was offered to Clinton and he refused to take him. those are documented. The only thing the Taliban would ever offer Bush is a very close shave with a dull knife.
2007-02-15 19:25:01 · answer #2 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
That question is easy to answer if you will read the following book it covers that very subject and more.
"You're Not Stupid! Get The Truth" by William John Cox
It is in paperback and only 300 easy to read pages.
2007-02-15 19:23:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Where does it say in that link that he rejected the offer?
I would like to know more about that myself and what ever became of the situation. But saying he rejected the offer is a falsification.
2007-02-15 19:20:41 · answer #4 · answered by sociald 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
now... I'm not sure this story is true... but what I find funny is... the Clinton story is far from iron clad... it actually has many holes... yet people act like it's proven for sure and call other things lies...
it's just funny how people only agree with propaganda that agrees with their political beliefs and no one really bothers to look into the facts...
2007-02-15 19:20:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because Osama was a CIA asset, and the Bush administration needs him to remain at large in order to perpetrate their so called war on terror.
P.S. Does anyone ever stop to think that both Bush and Clinton are at fault? Why does it have to be one or the other?
2007-02-15 19:17:43 · answer #6 · answered by Seraphim 3 · 1⤊ 7⤋
Boy, here we go again. Another can of worms.
2007-02-15 19:20:00 · answer #7 · answered by FILO 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sean, what happened to you????
Everyone knows that it was Clinton that saved Osama bin Laden's life 8 times.
He wanted a new friend.
You know that!!!!!!!
SEAN, DID YOU SELL OUT TO THE DEMOCRATS????????????????
2007-02-15 19:16:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
Bush did not want to capture Osama because he needed him to keep the fear factor going in order to invade Iraq.
2007-02-15 19:15:48 · answer #9 · answered by Jim G 4 · 4⤊ 7⤋
I don't get my news from that source! I don't believe that for a minute!!!!
2007-02-15 19:15:04 · answer #10 · answered by Dizney 5 · 6⤊ 4⤋