it's my opinion that this war is diversionary. if we weren't needing protection would we see anything positive in the bush administration?
2007-02-15 10:39:03 · 5 answers · asked by gregg w 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They would be talking about how many more Americans must die before we try to stop terrorism.Countless more civilians would have been killed by terrorists.No they would not have seen any positives in Bush because they think their job is to disagree with conservatives.
2007-02-15 11:34:28 · answer #1 · answered by shawnn 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are many domestic topics that would be discussed and maybe solved if it wasn't for the war in Iraq, which by the way has very little to do with the war on terror. Illegal aliens, health care, the deficit, the economy, global warming. Not in any particular order but those things need to be discussed.
2007-02-15 18:52:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We'd talk about Why Washington blew up about a year after 9/11
2007-02-15 18:50:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
rich country can execute its plan anywhere any time
since all the plan had been finalised .everybody have had the intruction by that time- what to do and when to do .if it hadnt had started america would be talking about energy crises
2007-02-16 01:12:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Illegal Immigration
Definitely not the stupid @ $$ theory of global warming it's nature get over it
2007-02-15 18:56:23 · answer #5 · answered by jason s 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋