2007-02-15 09:43:09 · 9 answers · asked by Razor Sharp II 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
alessa hit the nail on the head. I personally think the dems have better candidates because Hillary has not taken a strong enough stand against the Iraq war. However if misogynistic attacks against women or race baiting because of a name like Obama is the best you can come up with, the Democratic candidate should be a shoo-in.
2007-02-15 09:58:36 · answer #1 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. The name "Kotex" is a trademark. Are these the best arguments Reps and cons can come up with against Hillary? "She can't satisfy her husband", "She is ugly", "she is a dyke" etc., these arguments are pathetic and show extreme lack of education. Are all Rep/Con women subservients and lower class? If this is how Rep men treat female candidates, I am glad I am a Democrat!
EDIT: Kevin and tirdsnake proved my point. LOL
2007-02-15 17:50:24 · answer #2 · answered by alessa_sunderland 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Amen, it is scary she has a chance to become president.
Let's elect hillary and let another clinton make a joke out of the whitehouse.
2007-02-15 17:53:28 · answer #3 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I don't think so.
Hillary wouldn't even know what a Kotex is, unless she's tore some off on dates.
2007-02-15 17:51:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I think she already made a deal with Kerry over something to do with Ketchup.
2007-02-15 17:46:36 · answer #5 · answered by Josh 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
More like the Dike-o-rama.
So she won't be getting BJs in the oval office, she'll be giving muff jobs in the oval office.
2007-02-15 17:55:37 · answer #6 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Hey! Maybe she uses Stayfree, although I'm thinking that she doesn't use anything anymore.
2007-02-15 17:46:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Haha!
2007-02-15 17:49:04 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
That's just mean...you're a loser
2007-02-15 17:47:37 · answer #9 · answered by Bibi 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋