LOL... I can only whisper what I'm thinking in your ear... But I have to disagree with this statement.
2007-02-15 09:58:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Cause a bird in the hand is a sure thing, but two birds in the bush, you never know what you are going to get.
Yes, I probably am thinking the same thing as you. It sure would be a mess with two birds in one bush. lol
Of course, a bird in the hand can be a mess, too. Keep a washcloth nearby. lol
2007-02-16 06:00:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by nevada nomad 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, one type of bird I know is a rooster, otherwise known as a c*ck. So if the choice is between one in the hand or two in the bush, i would think the one in the hand would be less painful
2007-02-15 17:44:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Punkie'sDad 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
LMAO - because when a bird is in "hand" you are getting some action then when two birds are in a bush - then they are LMAO
2007-02-15 18:32:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
because if it's in YOUR HAND, you have a hold on it; if it's in the bush, whether it's two or more, you may not CATCH IT!
in other words, be grateful for what you can readily hold on to! peace
2007-02-16 23:07:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
no ;he likes birds
2007-02-15 17:44:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by booge 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Then you don't have to share ;)
2007-02-15 17:44:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
LOL--I doubt it.
2007-02-15 17:45:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by eeyoree rocks2003 7
·
1⤊
0⤋