omg it did suck sooo bad.. that was the biggest waste of 9$ I wasted. EVERYONE WHO HASNT SEEN THIS DONT WASTE UR TIME OR MONEY
2007-02-15 09:45:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mandy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a shame to see films that promise to parody the formulaic and over-constructed nature of "epic" films, but fail, and subsequently conform to what is now the "spoof" genre. In parodying said films, they merely reconstruct the setting (poorly) i.e. Willy Wonka's chocolate river becomes poo. The references to pop culture are 1: over used 2: Poorly used 3: Irrelevant and not funny. It appears that the budget was spent on midgets and a dance choreographer (apparently it is funny when medieval knights, pirates, dwarfs and oompa loompas dance). The narrative is infantile and not remotely funny, no imagination could possibly enjoy the pure nonsense of the characterization. Parody films are meant to parody and this one fails to come even close to funny, it irreverence is pathetic, not hilarious and the writers...well, where to start with them.
2007-02-15 12:10:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by KarahLiannaUK 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I sat through maybe 30 mins before getting up and walking out. Your correct however, the preview did make it look at least some what funny. I didn't pay to see the movie however so I lucked out there.
2007-02-15 09:34:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by terrorfex01 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it's pretty much like Date Movie, but with newer movies. I haven't watched it yet, but I'm going to tonight.
2007-02-15 09:34:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by fashleyluong 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I didnt like it, it was lame and not funny. so if you want to waste your money go watch this and past time..
2007-02-15 10:17:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by bigboi_94 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
i havent seen it but i heard it sucks i am looking in to seeing it and looking for my self
2007-02-15 13:12:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by =) =) 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
my kid the movie critic gave it a thumbs down,,, he said his friends thought it was lame also.
2007-02-15 09:33:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Chazz Drizzler 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
haven't seen it yet
2007-02-15 09:29:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by V 6
·
0⤊
0⤋