2007-02-15 09:15:29 · 6 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think you mean Ross Perot. We would be in a lot better shape as a nation. It would have legitimized third parties and the Demo-cans and Republi-crats would not hold the monopoly on power that they currently hold. All in all, this country would be a better place with more parties in the political process.
2007-02-15 09:19:43 · answer #1 · answered by 3rd parties for REAL CHANGE 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A better question would be, " Why did Perot just fade off the screen when he was riding a wave of popularity?"
Nonetheless, had he become president and was able to run the government, in the same manner that he ran his own private business, the trains might have run on time and his budget restraints might have precluded a war in Iraq.
And that great "sucking sound" of our jobs being deposited on foreign shores might never have been heard.
Isn't it weird that two such different types of humanity came out of the lone star state?
2007-02-15 17:47:27 · answer #2 · answered by Huero 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
we would not be in Iraq for one and our jobs would not be out sourced overseas for with him as president he would not have signed NAFTA
2007-02-15 17:18:30 · answer #3 · answered by billc4u 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We'd be somewhere over here on this here chart.
2007-02-15 17:21:10 · answer #4 · answered by .... . .-.. .-.. --- 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Where ever he is, I'll bet he's being very successful.
2007-02-15 17:18:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
either dead or speaking chinese
2007-02-15 17:17:23 · answer #6 · answered by jasonsluck13 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋