Who do you think will REALLY win at Wrestlemania between Batista and Undertaker?

Question

I am going to take some time to talk about the world title match at Wmania

Batista vs The Undertaker- That is going to be a great match. We have the man that is 14-0 at wrestlemania vs The world heavyweight champion. Undertaker vs Batista for wrestlemania was a rumored match that was said to take place at wrestlemania and it did become official. Now back when this match was rumored to take place, It was also said that batista would win the match, Retain his title, and end undertakers undefated streak. Now i know alot of people say that undertaker will win, But you have to think, Just cause taker is undefeated at wrestlemania , Doesnt mean he is going to ACTUALLY win. You need to understand that the wwe would rather put smackdowns top wrestler (Bastista) over in the match to make him look just that impressive. Now i know people would go NUTS if taker loses but hey, It might happen. I would hate it too. So my prediction for now is batista, Whats yours?

Answer 1

Every where I have read it syas Batista will win
If he does I swear I will stop watching WWE.
They should let this be the year of the Undertaker
winning the RR and then winning the title and going 15-0
If wwe really wants Taker to not get the title they should let Batista win by DQ.

But then the hell in a cell match happen and I'd rather see that

Answer 2

I think that the Undertaker will win. For a few reasons:

It has been mentioned that the Undertaker will retire soon. I think that because of this, the Undertaker will likely be given a run with the World Title. If the WWE can give Trish Stratus the Women's Title in her last match. they can do the same for the Undertaker.

The Undertaker is one of the longest tenured wrestlers currently on the WWE roster. Maybe in the history of the WWE. He was wrestling for the WWE since 1990. He has been loyal to the WWE during the success the WWE had during the Attitude era as well as when the WWE was losing the Monday Night Wars with the WCW. He has stayed in the WWE during the good times and the bad times.

The Royal Rumble winners of the last six years have went on to win either the World or the WWE Title at WrestleMania.

The Undertaker hasn't won a WWE or World Title since 2002. I think that five years is long enough to see the Undertaker without Championship gold.

The Undertaker has a large fanbase. The WWE will make more money at WrestleMania if the Undertaker wins the Title.

The Undertaker is undefeated at WrestleMania. I don't think it would make sense for the WWE to take away one of the most prestigious records for someone who has given their best in the ring since 1990.

Batista is injury prone. We have seen that last year. How long can the WWE depend on Batista to defend the World Title? While Batista is six or seven years younger than the Undertaker, he is pushing 40 years of age. His career isn't likely to last as long.

Answer 3

I personally feel it should be big daves last outing as the champ. Lets look at the stats, fair enough he may be longer running than mark "taker" calloway but do the fans really respect his achievements or cheer him because vince tells them too. Look at cena the fans are rebelling and now they boo him.

Also taker has always said he is prepared to lose at mania but only to the right person. By this i mean if the time is right, the place is right and for story lines it is right. Dave is not the man for the job, at 21 he wanted Kane to end it but Kane refused as he truly believed the streak should not end.

Finally, it would only make sense for a defeat to the streak to occur if the winning star could surpass the legacy and handle the torch being passed down. If he loses the old man (as taker critics say) is told he cant run with the younger ones, and a victory means he is unforgiving and wont pass the torch and move aside, therfore hes damned f he does and damned if he doesnt.

Mean Mark, Texas Red, Dice Morgan, The Undertaker....the streak must continue and david "leviathon" batista must rest in pieces.

Answer 4

Undertaker will make it 15-0 and 1-1 for Batista

Answer 5

I really like both of them But I'd have to say I hope Batista wins, just cause I think he might have alittle bit of the upper hand. But then again undertaker has a 14-0 winning streak so in the end the best man will come out Victorious.

Answer 6

I honestly think Batista will win, Undertaker is good and all but Batista is just to strong, but Undertaker has the best chance among the others on the Smackdown roster. So my guess is Batista will win but they may probaly just make Undertaker win and keep his streak going and the person winning the rumble wins wrestlemania thing going on.

Answer 7

Because taker is 14-0 at WM the WWE is setting it up to make it look like He will beat Batista, BUT I think HBK will beat Cena possibly turning Cena Heel, and Batista ends the Streak making him heel. Remember how the WM veterans are usually cheer for some reason at WM. (Hogan v. The Rock, Cena v. HHH) This I think will turn Batista Heel as well because he may "cheat" to win "playing to the crowd". All World Champions are currently Face. It would be odd for the WWE to go this long without having a heel with at least one title.

Answer 8

Undertaker

Answer 9

Undertaker for sure, but hey doesn't do house shows that often, and Batista is not well liked backstage, and the general feeling from the company is he isn't giving his "all" - so I expect 'Taker will win it, and then lose it a couple months later to Mr Kennedy or MVP as WWE sees them as "hungry", and that's how they want their champs to be, ala Cena and Lashley

Answer 10

As big as Dave Batista is, it wouldn't be wise for the WWE to have Undertaker put him over at Wrestlemania.