Just wondering what people are now thinking about the "Duke once was a rape case but now is a kidnapping and sexual assault" case? How do feminists, who were so certain there had been a rape based only upon the alleged victim's allegations, respond to the fact that the victim dropped the charges saying no rape ocurred DESPITE having first cried rape at the outset? If you tell me that sexual assault victims are confused and don't remember the facts of these incidents very well, then my response is that many of them must have been mistaken or "confused" as to a rape even occurring given the alleged victim's actions in this case. This means many innocent men have gone to jail on the basis of a woman's word alone, as recent use of DNA evidence in other cases has shown to actually be the case. Finally, with respect to this case, how can anyone continue to believe the accusor or discount the notion that this was an attempt to scam money from rich kids?
2007-02-15
07:28:31
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics