Below is a yahoo news cut out .
Notice how Murtha is saying that he wants to do somthing to make Bush have to get Congrestional permision .
Did the law change somewhere - it certainly seems so if a Senetor needs to do somthing to make Bush get permision .
Are you sure the sealing of Iran's borders and the aircraft carriers and the proposed 21,000 extra soldiers don't mean looming war ?
Murtha, who has been among Congress's foremost opponents of Iraq war policy, also said he is considering attaching a provision to a looming war spending bill that would bar U.S. military action against Iran without congressional approval.
2007-02-15
07:14:49
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
In his April 17 article, Hersh reported that "one of the military's initial option plans, as presented to the White House by the Pentagon this winter, calls for the use of a bunker buster tactical nuclear weapon, such as the B61-11, against underground nuclear sites." In his latest article, Hersh gets it right: "[T]he brass feel they were tricked into it – the nuclear planning – by being asked to provide all options in the planning papers." Indeed, as we wrote in our Nov. 1, 2005 column, "The strategic decision by the United States to nuke Iran was probably made long ago," by the civilian leadership, which fed it to military planners and now, according to Hersh, "feels extraordinarily betrayed by the brass." They may have taken the option out of discussion, but only formally.
According to the Nuclear Posture Review of 2001, nuclear weapons are envisioned in response to "surprising military developments," so they cannot have been ruled out unconditionally
2007-02-15
07:17:34 ·
update #1
Jorge Hirsh is a well respected world renowned professor of nuclear science in California
2007-02-15
07:19:00 ·
update #2