When will Empeor Bush give up on trying to conquer the middle east?

Answer 1

Emperors are not usually elected and have to face reelection after four years, and are not limited to just eight years total in power.
Emperors are not usually forced to work with an elected body of legislators that derive their power from the people. Emperors are not usually elected by the people either. Sorry, but you question is highly ignorant.

Answer 2

Probably never! But with Iran he won't have that option, because Democrats now control Congress. If he tries to attack Iran, Congress will not give him the authorization to do so, nor will they provide him the funding for such an effort, at least not with his costly games in Iraq still going on. And only they have the power, by the Constitution, to declare war and provide the funding for it. Whether he will admit it or not, Dubya is now being effectively checked by Congress and I feel that soon a series of investigations will start which will reveal the full extent of the Bush Administration's incompetence and malfeasance in the conduct of their so called "War on Terrorism," which can more correctly be characterized as an attack on the U.S. treasury. Here's a link to a report given today by the GAO to a congressional oversight committee which is very interesting.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070215/ap_on_go_ot/iraq_reconstruction_waste

Answer 3

nope, he would not elect the whole center east, he in simple terms needs their oil fields. This conflict became began for the incorrect reasons, now it has grown previous administration. it is going to flow on for some years via fact if we pull our troops out now, then there will be yet another Sadam waiting in line. It fairly would not rely what we do at this factor, human beings will nonetheless be dying. If we live, our troops and their troops wil die. to no longer point out all of the innocents from the motor vehicle bombs and suicide squads. If we flow away, Iran will attempt to overhaul Iraq, a sparkling dictatorial government would be set up and we would have new threats to our own usa. Peace is a pipe dream, it could be a appropriate element, even though it won't in any respect take place.

Answer 4

What we saw the other night, when he proposed more war against more "foes" was the madman the last six years have created. This time, in his war against Iran, he doesn't even feel the need for minimal PR, as he did before attacking Iraq. All he is bothering with are signals -- ships moving here, admirals moving there, consulates being raided in this other place. He no longer cares about the opinions of the voters, the Congress, the generals, the press, and he especially disdains the opinions of B/S/and B [Bush Sr, Scrowcroft, Baker]. Thanks to Gerson, he identifies his own little ideas with God (a blasphemy, of course, but hey, there's lots of precedent on this), so there's no telling what he will do.

We can tell by the evidence of the last two months that whatever it is, it will be exactly the thing that the majority of the voters do not want him to do, exactly the thing that James Baker himself doesn't want him to do. The propaganda that Bush's sponsors and handlers have poured forth has ceased to persuade the voters but succeeded beyond all measure in convincing the man himself.

He will tell himself that God is talking to him, or that he is possessed of an extra measure of courage, or he that he is simply compelled to do whatever it is. The soldiers will pay the price in blood. We will pay the price in money. The Iraqis will pay the price in horror. The Iranians will pay the price, possibly, in the almost unimaginable terror of nuclear attack. Probably, the Israelis will pay the price, too.

Little George isn't the same guy he was in 2000, the guy described by Gail Sheehy in her Vanity Fair profile -- hyper-competitive and dyslexic, prone to cheat at games, always swinging between screwing up and making up, hating criticism and disagreement, careless of others but often charming. He is no longer the guy who the Republicans thought they could control (unlike, say, McCain).

The small pathologies of Bush the candidate have, thanks to the purposes of the neocons and the religious right, been enhanced and upgraded. We have a bona fide madman now, who thinks of himself in a grandiose way as single-handedly turning the tide of history. Some of his Frankensteins have bailed, some haven't dared to, and others still seem to believe. His actions and his orders, especially about Iran, seem to be telling us that he will stop at nothing to prove his dominance. The elder Bush(es), Scrowcroft, Baker, and their friends, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gerson, and the neocons have made the monster and in the process endangered the country, the Constitution, and the world, not to mention the sanity of wretches like Jose Padilla (for an analysis of the real reason Gitmo continues to exist, see Dahlia Lithwick's article in Slate, [excerpt below].

Maybe the bums planned this mess for their own profit, or maybe they planned to profit without mess; maybe some of them regret what they have wrought. However, they all share the blame for whatever he does next.

Answer 5

PRESIDENT BUSH is not trying to conquer the middle east simpleton, it's called keeping our country safe & our freedom secure. The very freedom that gives you the right to bash your president! Thank you & have a nice day!

Answer 6

January 20, 2009 the day he leaves office legally.

Answer 7

Hopefully when he nukes Iran. They will all know we mean business. God Bless America, and God Bless President Bush!!!

Answer 8

I think he has. The Neocon agenda wasn't supported by the voters, and he has to moderate now to save the GOP.

Answer 9

When will Sam W get a clue?

Answer 10

When you stop molesting the cub scouts.