2007-02-15 06:27:01 · 17 answers · asked by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes !!! They must !!
This should be over Now !! This world can not stand with such Baseless wars anymore, which are only taking the lives on both sides and doing only harm and no good at all !! We have made this world miserable and i m sorry to say America has played a great part in it !! why not US stop this all and let the world live in peace ??
And i know its just a dream !! can never be a reality, because for US there is no way to retreat !and Bush is going on 'oneway Road and aimed to go only forward ! no backward route !
What a misery !
2007-02-15 06:57:23 · answer #1 · answered by ★Roshni★ 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We already do.
In case you didn't notice, we have an embassy in almost every country on the planet, and we are the creators and sponsors of most of the global organizations throughout the world, including the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, and countless civilian organizations.
Liberals get so hung up on our very limited military actions that they become completely oblivious to our history of creating and restoring world peace.
You know, just from memory I can think of a dozen humanitarian crises around the world that the US military resolved almost single-handedly, sometimes with efforts from the American Red Cross.
We've done so much for the world that it's really hard not to love this country and this people!
2007-02-15 20:54:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Before you can communicate w/ a man, you must first learn to speak his language. If a man communicates w/ hate and violence, you can't come to hime w/ peace. You need to first learn his language, then there can be a dialogue and some understanding between both. Simply just speaking the language of peace to him, is not going to make him understand you.
You may argue that speaking the language of peace long enough will cause him to eventually understand, but if he doesn't want to learn that language, you are wasting your time, and it's better for you to learn his language.
2007-02-15 14:44:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The only way we are assured our peace is by being willing to back it up with force. Maybe someday the lion will lie down with the lamb but given the track record I am going to bet on the lion not going to bed hungy for the forseeable future.
2007-02-15 14:33:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
We should emphasize our national security and interests, and our safety.
War and peace (the military, diplomacy) are tools. We should use them to achieve our goals, although of course peace is to be preferred, all else being equal.
2007-02-15 14:35:46 · answer #5 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Like the 18 months of peace that led up to the invasion of Iraq?
Then again, during that time they were still violating UN ordinances, shooting at US aircraft, and refused to give an account for their chemical weapons.
2007-02-15 14:34:42 · answer #6 · answered by anidealworld 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
In cases in which it would apply. Walk softly and carry a big stick is still the best foreign policy.
2007-02-15 14:38:24 · answer #7 · answered by .... . .-.. .-.. --- 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely.
2007-02-15 14:32:07 · answer #8 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
all nations should be emphasizing peace not war. But, it won't happen. Nobody knows how to get along, nobody knows how to compromise. its all actually quite ridiculous if you ask me.
2007-02-15 14:31:23 · answer #9 · answered by jwk227 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We tried peace, and regardless of peace or war, the world shat on our parade. Screw the world, bow before us or face the wraith
2007-02-15 14:30:21 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋