After Hillary kills our economy with Universal Healthcare and higher taxes, will libs blame Bush?

Question

Or will they own up to their love for economic killing socialist ideals?

Answer 1

She will kill the economy.

In the last six years the economy has done nothing but thrive.

The Dow and NASDAQ is at all time highs, real estate purchases are at an all time high, consumer spending are at an all time high, unemployment has been on the decline.

anyone saying otherwise just does not want to believe this could happen under a republicans watch.

Clinton had us taxed out the wazoo, property sales were horrible and unemployment rose. There are a lot of people out there that believe he was great for the economy...go figure.

Answer 2

I agree that Hillary is pretty bad, but higher taxes HELP our economy. Think about it, when Bush Sr. raised taxes, the budget was balanced in the first time since ANDREW JACKSON! That's over 160 years ago. Meanwhile, while Reagan lowered taxes, we were left with a RECORD DEFICIT (which Bush has now topped), and with Bush's tax cut, the dollar is dropping, the middle class shrinking while the deficit rises, and the cost of living and housing market are through the roof. So no, when the economy is fixed, Bush will recieve the credit he deserves: none.

Answer 3

Well the higher taxes will only affect people like the Bush's so who cares. And Universal healthcare will be paid for out of the taxes. And this will help the poor.
The doctors and hospitals and insurance companies that are currently making a killing will soon be like the rest of us - making a living.

Answer 4

You ought to know this one. The libs will be blaming Bush until another Republican becomes president. Then they will talk about how bad the next one is to Bush.

Answer 5

Republicans are no better. Remember their dramatic expansion of prescription drug coverage under Medicare, the No Pharmaceutical Company Left Behind bill? That's the worst of both worlds together - corporate welfare and massive irresponsible expansion of social programs.

Last time I checked, when Bill Clinton left office, the budget was balanced. An extraordinary achievement given the mess he inherited from Reagan and Bush Sr. - and primarily achieved through cuts and organic growth of a thriving economy.

Answer 6

that's because the Republicans were all about "deregulation!" "deregulation!" for the previous 20 years. John McCain stated in an interview very last March that he replaced into in actuality for deregulation. easily one of his closest economic advisors, Phil Gramm, has been the author of important banking deregulation. nicely, we used to have rules that could want to have prevented the type of volatile loans that banks and the loan marketplace were giving out. those loans were so volatile that they were giving out homes to human beings without information of earnings! the individuals on Wall St. were making a fortune in the couple of minutes period, promoting those volatile investments bundled up in one of those fashion that individuals did not precisely recognize what they were making an investment in ("derivatives"). actually, if we had had proper regulation and rules that prevented those volatile loans, and bundling them into those funding applications which have little or no visibility, we does no longer have considered the crumple of those sorts of important banks. area of the issue is likewise the shortcoming of lengthy-time period incentives for Wall St. all and sundry is paid on their annual or perhaps quarterly performance. although, the monetary repercussions of those sub-best mortgages did not hit till years later, because rates of pastime and funds does no longer be raised for 5 years in a lot of situations. finally, there is the issue of authorities spending. bill Clinton worked frustrating to create the lower priced surplus. that's top - we had the lower priced surplus below him! A decrease nationwide debt actually provides the country a more desirable sensible credit status. This leads to diminish rates of pastime, which stimulate the monetary gadget. The Bush administration has spent like loopy in the only top 8 years and left that surplus some distance in the back of. we'd want to have spent 1000 billion funds on the Iraq war. Now, i recognize human beings say we are more desirable sensible off without Saddam, yet particularly, pondering we not in any respect discovered WMDs and that is no longer the position Bin weighted down is -- replaced into it nicely worth 1000 billion? wish that enables.

Answer 7

Keeping in mind the libs blame EVERYTHING from hurricanes to a friggin' hangnail on GW.........

IF she were to EVER be elected (NOT!), she would do exactally as her "husband" did, ride on coattails of Reagan's economy and claim it all for himself. Clinton ran this country into the ground with the HIGHEST tax increase EVER seen, his "Boy-toy "wife" is going to do just the same.

God forbid we ever see the Hildabeast in the White House again.

Answer 8

didn't you know, the only reason socialism and communism don't work is because they haven't been tried properly yet. (pause to laugh)

no seriously, you're absolutely right. they'll do their best to blame Bush and his "war for oil."

Answer 9

How is she going to kill it when you will be paying your fair share? The economy always thrives with a Democrat. Republicans got fat off of the misery of others these last 7 years. America knows the difference.

Answer 10

Oh, they are on a Bush roll. Poor man will be blamed for everything from now on.....Sheeeeesh~!