You have posted content to Yahoo! Answers in violation of our Community Guidelines. As a result, your content has been deleted.
Question: Do you Give Bush Credit for Ending Global Warming?
Question Details: Are you ******* retarded! Seriously, Bush has not done **** for the environment and will never do anything for the environment. there is only one person who wants do do anything for it and that person is Al Gore. if the temperatures prove anything its that the environment is getting worse and worse. You jack hole are you just that blind and dumb to the medias wit. I hope that you can see past the bush propaganda and see that he is a mongrel idiot I'm sorry that i say that but as a republican i feel very bad for voting him in again. sorry if the language is strong but i have the freedom of speech on my side and because ******* i fight for it i will ******* use it.
Reason of Violation:Insulting Other Participants
I really dont believe that im in woilation of anything
2007-02-15 03:51:26 · 7 answers · asked by chuck_norris1997 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
thats not what im getting at. but oh well well just leave it be, im under the assumption that the guy was upset i said what i felt the truth.
2007-02-15 04:01:53 · update #1
i agree with you and i find it wrong for all you to say that the amendments set by our founding fathers are un alienable and can not have anything over write them just cause some one feels upset at the truth doesnt mean that they should violate you form what you believe.
2007-02-15 04:12:58 · update #2
I agree with you wholeheartedly. Women can post their boobs instead of an avatar, and people can ask for advice about how to kill their spouse, but they give YOU a violation for expressing an opinion. I have received a couple of violations and I wrote back yesterday asking if anyone at Yahoo!Answers even monitors the site for like porn stuff. I received a violation and had an answer removed for letting someone know that the term "jew down" is racist. And I was raised a catholic and am now a Christian! But if someone used the "N" word-oh no!
Y!Answers needs to get their act together.
2007-02-15 04:06:49 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your conception of the (not yours) 1st Amendment rights are strange. You can go to jail for yelling fire in a crowded theater, you can get the stuffing beat out of you for using foul language in front of my kids, and (this is the big one) not many people give any real credence or even pay attention to those that think peppering their speech with crude miss-guided foul words is acceptable.
If you spent as much time learning words that can be powerful rather than using words that defeat your purpose, I suspect you could make you point sound a little more intelligent.
You may be a smart person, but know very little about the way people think. Your original question is moot because of your perception of the 1st Amendment. Correct your mind set and you may get some decent answers. Otherwise I don't ****** care!
2007-02-15 12:11:01 · answer #2 · answered by ggraves1724 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No it is not. Rights granted by the constitution only apply to actions by the government.
Yahoo is a private entity and therefore cannot trample your first amendment rights or any of your constitutional freedoms.
2007-02-15 12:00:40 · answer #3 · answered by Peter 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
You insulted the person who posted the question by calling him retarded. You also used epithets and curse words which violate the community guidelines. Yahoo can have any rules it wants.
2007-02-15 12:00:57 · answer #4 · answered by notyou311 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, that is a violation of terms. Your first amendment right is not applicable in this situation... you voluntarily agreed to the terms set by yahoo.
2007-02-15 11:55:53 · answer #5 · answered by jh 6 · 6⤊ 1⤋
The Bill of Rights applies to the government, not to a private entity like Yahoo. It is their site, and they can censor it however they see fit.
2007-02-15 12:04:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
This Q & A forum belongs to Yahoo! and you do not have any 1st amendment rights here.
2007-02-15 11:56:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋