Look what the news says! (FYI - Ms Marshall aka Anna Nicole)
....According to the sworn affidavit written in the Bahamas on December 4, 2006, Quethlie Alexis claims she received repeated threats from Smith, aka Vickie Marshall, to "underfeed" Dannielynn because, "Ms. Marshall was obsessed with making sure that her baby was 'sexy.' Ms. Marshall knew that the correct amount of baby food was 3 ounces every 3 hours ... Ms. Marshall insisted that the maximum I was to give was 2.5 ounces." Alexis claims that Smith enforced the order by "making sure the baby monitor was kept on all the time." Alexis adds Dannielynn "is badly underweight and not thriving, as a baby should."...
2007-02-15 03:05:08 · 17 answers · asked by Hey you! 3 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
According to various news reports I have heard and pieced together, she was apparently a waitress, turned topless dancer, turned Playboy centerfold, turned golddigger, turned reality TV personality, turned weight loss model. Shortly after her death I heard one reporter asking people on the street what they thought of her passing. One man asked, "Why is everybody making such a big deal over the death of someone who is famous for doing absolutely nothing at all?"
I think I know the answer. I believe the media made her who she became and now they are feeling extremely guilty for having possibly contributed to her death by doing so. It looks to me like the media is trying to pay pennance for its sins.
Gerald Ford should have gotten so much attention.
2007-02-15 03:43:27 · answer #1 · answered by JV 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Once again, here we go with someone that "has some news" that places Anna in a negative light...come on now - IF this woman Knew that the "child" was being malnurished or abused in any way - WHY didn't she feel this news was important to reveal to the proper authorities during the time which the abuse could have continued. Anna is deceased, she can't underfeed the child now- so what benefit is it to come with this news at this point...Simple - "To get your name out there in the news, b/c you have info that no one else has come forward with - so you can secure a deal for money of your own.......".i mean she couldn't very well claim to be the father now could she...It is disgusting on either side of the story - if she knew this & it was fact & didn't come forward to stop the child from being harmed she is then guilty criminally & moraly...........if this is just another attempt of the common to be famous by slurring the dead - well that's wrong on a number of levels.... & here we have Anna's own mother coming forward getting into the fray, knowing that anna had astranged herself from her a very very long time ago, voluntarialy...... vultures - one & all. shame on 'em all!
2007-02-15 04:22:41 · answer #2 · answered by rjsluvbug 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I do not believe that. Anna Nicole although she often went down the wrong road loved Daniel and I am sure doated over the baby. She would in no way care about her being "sexy" That would be out of character for her. Anna was the type of person that did not care what people thought. What you saw is what you got. She was real. I think the whole thing is sad.
2007-02-15 03:35:58 · answer #3 · answered by brandi from texas 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i does no longer have self assurance each and every thing they allow you to recognize in the media, because, noticeably with situations like those, that's many times sensationalized. To me, Alexis seems jumping on the acceptance bandwagon even as this finished Anna Nicole ingredient is "warm," and so she seems getting her twenty minutes of acceptance that way. of route, although, Anna Nicole replaced into really a gold-digger (that's shown by technique of her former marriage to a ninety-365 days-old billionare!!!) and not in any respect very dignified, to assert the least (former Playboy variety, likely a whore, etc.) So i do not imagine Anna Nicole kept Dannielynn underweight (she replaced into no feather herself, and she or he replaced into very wakeful about her visual charm-- so weight ought to no longer were one of those massive deal to her), yet I really imagine Anna Nicole isn't someone you may want to opt to have on your proper buddy. to boot, how can a toddler be "eye-catching"?!!!!!!
2016-11-03 12:48:52 · answer #4 · answered by wolter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She was a person who got on the wrong road "the road to nowhere leads to me" so to speak. Those of us who did not personally know her and only assume from the characteristics of other addicts which are ego-manic, narcissist, self-involved. However: this does not mean she was all bad --seems like she was a very lost person and did not know who to trust. The drugs probably made her act irrational as far as the feeding of her little girl --if that is true.
2007-02-15 03:21:49 · answer #5 · answered by luminous 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
She was a sad lonely person, searching through life for something she felt she was missing, attention, acceptance, love. It really makes you think about your actions on your children and how they affect them for the rest of their lives. Could her life have been different if the relationship with her mother would have been better? Will her daughter's life be better without the influence of her around or will her daughter feel the same need to find something she feels she is missing?
2007-02-15 03:32:55 · answer #6 · answered by tish s 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
She was a very sick and confused person. She let the money and fame go to her head forgetting her roots and background. I cannot believe that she had that bad of a childhood. Who among us has some bad memories from childhood. Get over it, I say. The poor thing will never get over it now. Ashamed !!!
2007-02-15 03:32:38 · answer #7 · answered by cwigg 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
A sad woman who had faults like many other people in the world. Of course many of you here on Yahoo have never made any mistakes in your life.
2007-02-15 04:57:58 · answer #8 · answered by evildragon1952 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
She was rich...she was shapely (early years)..... she was a public icon... she was a mother....she was in too deep with drugs..... and she "IS" dead...!!!! What a waste of life, Just like the king "ELVIS"
2007-02-15 03:38:55 · answer #9 · answered by jc 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
From what everyone is saying she was a very shallow person.
2007-02-15 03:17:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋