To what extent do people regard religion as a source of conflict?

Question

sociology homework

Answer 1

It's not a source.

It's an excuse for conflict.

Answer 2

I don't think it is religion that causes conflict it is the way people practise the religion that causes conflict. The lack of respect for another's belief and their right to belief.

I also think that the way that a person is brought up also has a huge impact - for example conflict between Israel and Palestine - both bring religion as one of their differences - although there are other huge issues there. But it has got into a vicious cycle of violence - the children there grow up watching the adults fight constantly with each other and follow when they get older.

Yet if you put 2 year olds from both sides together in a room- they will just play with each other . It's a cycle that will never end until some brave people decide that what has happened in the past should stay there and work together to bring a lasting peace.

Answer 3

I regard it as a source of conflict because I believe most wars are started due to religious differences. People seem to take it personally if anyone doesn't agree with their belief system. A few of us are prepared to live and let live, but many more believe that their religion is the ONLY right one and that everyone else should follow them. Non-believers tend to see this as a very arrogant point of view and so the conflict begins!

Answer 4

Every Source in the middle east.

It seems as if it is always the muslims, Causing the trouble, Im not saying its all of them because it is not but radical elements it most certainley is, Muslim Extremists caused all the conflict with US, If they hadnt bombed the World trade centre, Allied forces would not be fighting in Iraq now. Look at Darfur Region, its the muslims there aswell.
Another good example of Religion causing conflict is The Catholics Vs The Protestants in what was known as the troubles in Ireland. Also there is conflict on homesoil everyday with youths battle with each other, not just because of religion but you do notice a seperation of religions, in England for example the majority of white youths would be Non religious & the majority of Asian youths would be muslim.

Answer 5

it has been the cause of most conflicts since time began. probably due to it being the one thing that people really believe in and get very offended when people challenge it.

it is also a great source of peace and understanding and unites many people.

Answer 6

Religion is the original and best source of conflict!

Answer 7

It's the greatest source of conflict.

Answer 8

the issue looks to commence with the non secular part. faith sees technological know-how's skill to construct itself on statement, hypothesis and attempt and could develop into envious of technological know-how's seen, verifiable procedure. So it tries to mimic the approach, recasting its arguments as theories, sweeping the needed gaps of religion out of sight, and tacking on inspite of cloth "information" looks to in good structure. it really is deceptive, both to the global and to its real objective. faith is about faith, about searching previous the glaring and searching for something more desirable. It calls for consistent recommitment. it really is something yet particular. those who seek for "actuality" have lost their faith. technological know-how, on the different hand, is all about actuality. It rejects pat motives and assessments assumptions, searching for blunders and inconsistencies, with the only top objective of having the reason top. this obstacles technological know-how to the observable global, yet a global that maintains to be too deep to thoroughly understand. each and every nicely-known theory should be in a position to regulate itself to account for brand spanking new, contradictory information till it no longer can and yields to a more desirable moderen, more desirable sensible theory. A scientist who has invested a lot right into a theory that he can no longer evaluate a demonstrable yet radical new interpretation stumbles into the realm of religion and loses medical objectivity. Scientists and theologians might want to certainly, finally, be searching for an identical ingredient, an underlying HOW that's indistinguishable from the only top WHY. yet their disciplines are incompatible. If technological know-how does no longer guard objectivity, it no longer learns. If faith would not proceed to come across for deeper meaning, its pronouncements develop into esoteric trivialities. they ought to each and every guard their distance and their personal integrity, even as respecting the others' jurisdiction. in the different case we've a medieval muddle of meaningless secret. i visit do without the fad, yet I insist on a sparkling separation between reason and instinct.

Answer 9

Take a look around the world

Answer 10

Check out John Lennon's "Imagine."