2007-02-15 02:43:25 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
No, you just have to tell me.
2007-02-15 02:45:52 · answer #1 · answered by Kedar 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
In most cases, absolutely not. His or her life doesn't need to be screwed up by your own desire for exposure.
You're not the only one who's banged famous people. Just enjoy your relationship and realize that this person is a human being and not a piece of meat or a trophy.
If the famous person were someone who has spoken out loudly against gay people or publicly expressed hatred in some form towards them, then I think that changes things dramatically. Otherwise, there is nothing wrong with being discrete.
2007-02-15 03:00:10 · answer #2 · answered by DavidGC 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not unless that person is openly attacking homosexuals verbally or physically. The only time publicly outing someone becomes a civic duty is in cases of hypocrisy or a breach of ethical conduct.
2007-02-15 03:09:10 · answer #3 · answered by IndyT- For Da Ben Dan 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
this is rather opinionated. supply the guy some thing to vote for and the understanding to make an easy decision. we've grew to become the election technique right into a tribulation to vote for the least offensive candidate. The merchandising has enforced that. till we get human beings to run for place of work that communicate relating to the themes and what they might do, we are able to proceed to have uninformed ignorant persons that in simple terms fell that that's a type of two evils. i individually think of that the events elect it that way via fact it reduces the voters to party loyalists which will vote. i'm of the opinion that we would desire to characteristic "not one of the above' to the pollto grant us uninformed politically ignorant human beings some place to make a valid fact and a loose decision.
2016-12-17 10:35:13 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would it be a civic duty? Will it somehow benefit the town you live in?
I'm sure you're anxious for your 15 minutes of fame like most media whores.
2007-02-15 02:50:20 · answer #5 · answered by castle h 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you have any dirt whatsoever on a famous person, even if it's just made up, it's your civic duty to hold a press conference. Or so it seems.
2007-02-15 02:49:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't say civic duty but its your choice what would you gain besides maybe a law suit
2007-02-15 12:04:18 · answer #7 · answered by hot choclate 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does this person have no right to a personal life?...... You should not kiss and tell......
ONE EXCEPTION....... If this person is famous because he preaches about the sins of homosexuality and says all homo should burn in H E L L ....... then by all means..... shout it out to the world.
2007-02-15 03:39:14 · answer #8 · answered by PNSGUY 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well, if this person is openly homosexual and you have broken up with the person, go ahead and make yourself some $CASH$. If ther person isn't openly homosexual, you could he destroying his/her life, a guilt which you will have to carry forever.
2007-02-15 02:50:44 · answer #9 · answered by Ash 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would it be? keep personal things personal, unless you want to be discriminated by the world. With all the narrow minded people out there, I think it's a big possibility that a person would shout towards you "hey it's that gay guy that's with < insert name here >", That is if, you tell it to the media of course, my opinion, keep it a secret.
=) enjoy banging.
2007-02-15 02:47:27 · answer #10 · answered by IanTan 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No,it's not.If you had homosexual realtions with a regular person is it your duty to tell their parents?No...Lol on the other hand....You would make alot of money...Espically if you had pictures.
2007-02-17 02:59:05 · answer #11 · answered by jill@doodle 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋