Iran is needed to keep peace in iraq
2007-02-15 02:41:11 · 10 answers · asked by impeachbushnoww 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Sorry, but you're quite wrong. It is in the interest of Iran for Iraq to fall into chaos and anarchy. In fact, it is against the interests of Iran to have a successful democratic government next door, where the government is answerable to the people, where free speech is a right.
Anybody who'd believe otherwise is gullible to Iran's propaganda.
It is painfully obvious that Iran seeks to destabilize Iraq, and has been trying to do so for years.
2007-02-15 02:52:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The world powers are automatically weakened. This would give the Iranian president the feeling that the USA sanctions all it does. If you would keep up with the Middle East news you would find they are trusted by few, even in their own blocks. Then you have the Algiers Accords that was signed into law. Iran needs to keep it's weapons in it's own country. Lebanon needed Iran and Syria to keep the peace too. Look at that country. How about Palestine? Few people read the warnings coming from Egypt towards Iran. Saudi Arabia does not trust this country at all. These are people that live there daily. They know that Iran is not after peace but their old kingdom back.
2007-02-15 02:55:36 · answer #2 · answered by grandma 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First, we are conversing about rep's. The war state of affairs is their important starting up position and recipe. This's what they're made off! So, there comes bush, cowboy macho!! that he's and provides you his personal formula! "shoot first ask latter", with the objective to speak to their important menu to modern himself as a frustrating southern rep!?!! subsequently, makes a large mess and motives thousands to perish,...! bear in mind '''challenge achieved'' & ''deliver'em on''!!! Then he were given his tail tucked up between his ft and ate the airborne dirt and dust!! yet nevertheless no longer admitting his blunders and lies! to boot, OIL, war profiteering, palms revenues and all those BS that bush will also receives his decrease alongside the way, communicate is out of Que.! Longer the war, sensible for bush and his celebration. Do you spot the shortcoming of recognize-how between responses?!! those are also an identical crowed who're helping this clownish, maladroit president!
2016-11-03 12:43:32 · answer #3 · answered by lobos 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When Colin Powell was drawing up the details in 03 for negitiations with Iran, Bush and Cheney told him to STFU.
2007-02-15 02:44:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't like Bush, either. But I am having issues with your question/statement:
1. One can't rationalize with a toddler or a madman (have you seen or heard that guy?? The modern-day Hitler. . .).
2. Keep peace in Iraq? They are supplying the insurgents with weapons! How in the hell are they participating in the peace-keeping process? The only process they are participating in is eliminating our soldiers!
2007-02-15 02:45:59 · answer #5 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Exactly how long is one expected to "talk" to a country that refuses to participate and is aiding and abetting our known enemy?
You probably think we should have waited for the UN to issue more resolutions on Iraq, right?
2007-02-15 03:05:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because Bush is a War Monger. That means he loves war, and does not care about human lives that are killed and maimed.
2007-02-15 02:47:02 · answer #7 · answered by billy brite 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
OK stay where you are, the men in the white suits are coming.
2007-02-15 03:31:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
bush and ahmadinejad(?) are like two kids on the playground,neither are to be taken seriously.
2007-02-15 02:49:17 · answer #9 · answered by J Q Public 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
...because you can't get multi-billion dollar peace contracts
2007-02-15 02:45:41 · answer #10 · answered by KidDynomite 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋