not.it removes the protection of the foreskin and sexual function.
Date: 01/21/2004
'Female arousal disorder' blamed on circumcised penises
A New Zealand study found that reduced female arousal and fewer female orgasms
may be linked to women having sex with circumcised male partners. Women reported
they were about twice as likely to experience orgasm if their male partner had a
foreskin.
Nine out of ten women prefer having sex with intact men, the study finds.
"Presence of the movable foreskin makes a difference in foreplay, being more
arousing to the female," the study says. "Most likely, reported vaginal dryness
and the related clinical designation `female arousal disorder' is but a normal
female response to coitus with a man with an iatrogenically [doctor caused]
deficient penis."
The foreskin is double-layered. During intercourse, the moist and pliant
foreskin rolls past itself massaging the vagina and exciting it more than the
'dry stick' of a circumcised penis. The foreskin keeps the glans moist and soft
aiding in foreplay, insertion, and intercourse. Dry or painful sex is the number
one sexual complaint of women in the United States.
"During intercourse, the skin of an intact penis slides up and down the shaft,
stimulating the glans and the nerves of the inner and outer foreskin. On the
outstroke, the glans is partially or completely engulfed by the foreskin with
more skin remaining inside the vagina than is the case with the circumcised
penis. This `valve' mechanism is thought to retain the natural lubrication
provided by the female because the bunched up skin acts to block the lubrication
escaping from the vagina, which results in dryness."
About 70% of American men alive today are circumcised. About 60% of U.S. baby
boys are circumcised each year
2007-02-15 03:45:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
We pondered that question with our boys. We finally decided to do it. It is easier to keep clean that way. I know they say with the access to easy hygiene that is not an issue, but how do you know that your son will always have that access?
However, we did not get our babies a vitamin K shot and then have them circumcised. We waited until they were a week old when their natural level of vit. K was at its highest point. They did not bleed much at all.
We also had the doctor use a local ansthetic when the baby was circumcised.
2007-02-15 10:31:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by pennypincher 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
I can't say one way or the other...I have two boys that are circumsized but one of my sons is not. There are advantages and disadvantages. I dont think that smell or hygiene is a factor. You just have to know how to take care of it. I have never had a problem with either, and its funny but when I potty trained my uncircumsized son, I noticed he didn't seem to miss as much as my other two did because the foreskin helps act as a shield from the stream going crazy!! I am getting ready to have another boy and my husband and I have decided not to circumsize him. It's cheaper not to do it (considering we have to pay for it) and It's become more common these days not to do it, but I don't see anything wrong with getting it done either if that is what you want to do.
2007-02-15 11:11:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Proud_Army_Wife26 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
I would choose circumcision because there are many problems that can later develop. These problems require circumcision, so why not do it now when you're son will never remember? The article listed below goes over many of the increased health problems suffered my uncircumcisized men.
2007-02-15 12:12:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by rosekm 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
I am glad that I am circumcised. I like the way it looks and feels.
2007-02-15 11:10:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
Definately a yes!! They smell bad even if the guy does wash very well/have good hygenie, it still traps bacteria in the foreskin from sweat and urine. The girl is more prone to UTI's from the bacteria growth. Over all they are cleaner and much neater when circumsized. Hope this helps you...
2007-02-15 10:32:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by ~MommaOf2Angels~ 2
·
2⤊
4⤋
I didn't have much of a choice, I was only one day old, But, I would still have to say yes, much cleaner.
2007-02-15 10:40:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by b T 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well guys say it will make it look bigger but I bet it's painful for a while afterwards. It's there to protect the penis.
2007-02-15 10:29:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sean K 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
I think do it because it is cleaner
2007-02-15 18:39:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Tommy 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
If you really, really loved your new born son, why would you put him through something like this?
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b364/hollywoodz_horror/Hayden11106155.jpg
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b364/hollywoodz_horror/Hayden11106156.jpg
2007-02-15 11:04:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jake D 3
·
1⤊
3⤋