Just after World War 2?
2007-02-15 02:07:05 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Uh, no.
2007-02-15 02:08:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, Americans voted for a man named George right after the American Revolution and George was the name of the King of England at the time. So I guess my point is that the citizens of this country were more intelligent than anyone today who may vote against someone just because their name is the same or similar to that of someone else.
2007-02-15 10:13:30 · answer #2 · answered by Punkie'sDad 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
THe name "Hitler" means evil.
And no, they wouldn't have voted for "Dieter Hitler Josef".
2007-02-15 10:14:48 · answer #3 · answered by "I Want to Know Your Answer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe not just after WW2, because Americans of that time were different. But today... well, just like some intend to vote for Hitlery Clinton or some other NATOzis.
2007-02-15 10:20:27 · answer #4 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure some Americans would vote for such a candidate.
2007-02-15 10:12:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yea, with Barack Hussein Obama as his running mate.
2007-02-15 10:36:53 · answer #6 · answered by Terence C 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Germany had never attacked any US interests, it would have worked. But since Germany decided to make the US its enemy, it would not have worked.
2007-02-15 10:09:50 · answer #7 · answered by MrKnowItAll 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
.
2007-02-15 10:10:25 · answer #8 · answered by I hate friggin' crybabies 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think the name is not as important as the guy's proram and qualification. judgeing someone by his name is soo superficial:(
2007-02-15 10:09:58 · answer #9 · answered by VeronicaB 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Emotions rule.
2007-02-15 10:09:35 · answer #10 · answered by Casperia 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i 'm guessing you referring to Barack Hussien Obama wouldnt that shiz be ironic if he became president
2007-02-15 10:10:32 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋