I would argue that since Lincoln, we've had corporation rule, regardless of who is sitting in the White House.
2007-02-15 02:01:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by It's Me 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
In England the royal family does not really have all the power, instead they are what is called a figurehead. I don't think that the president of the united states really has a whole lot more power then what the royal family does. I'm not saying that it doesn't matter at all who becomes president, but what I am saying is that the possition is mostly there so that someone seperate from our government can take the fall should something bad happen or the people become unhappy with the way things are being handled.
2007-02-15 02:08:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by InuYasha chic 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
I for one do compared to her for our next President. dissimilar people imagine that in the adventure that they vote for Hillary, then they receives 4 more beneficial years of the bill Clinton years. (no longer that this can be an effective aspect) yet for her supporters it is. i'd frequently have more beneficial appreciate for the female had she divorced bill after he cheated on her with an intern contained in the oval workplace and then perjured himself in the front of congress. the female basically has no backbone, and if she will't face as a lot as one guy, how will we assume her to face as a lot as different international's maximum ruthless adult men? different "positives" you'll possibly listen are "free, socialized health care," (no longer that it is even a mediocre theory) and ...... oh wait, i wager that is about it to boot that that is not any longer George Bush or a Republican. Please, all those who're solid, good, honest, and smart, do no longer vote for this spineless, immoral, witc.....I advise Senator.
2016-12-04 05:13:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
well I love that hiliary is running, but i think she chose the worst possible time, with the troops in Iraq i mean its not that i doubt her capacity to run our country but with all these problems and all, but i dont know maybe she could change things. i know what you mean four more years for the clintons, but she is on the top three of the candidates there is a possibility. for me its a difficult decision, give a woman a chance? i would. and now giuliani is running too....
2007-02-15 02:09:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I'll vote for the person who I believe is the right individual for the job. Whether it's a woman or an African American, I feel I will have done my civic duty.
2007-02-15 02:01:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Reo 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
your are assuming a lot.
Bush 1 - 4yrs
Clinton - 8 yrs
Bush 2 - 8 yrs
total = 20 yrs
so you're assuming hillary will get elected 2 times.
2007-02-15 02:01:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
28 years huh? Well they must be doing something right then.
2007-02-15 02:00:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by maybe 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
THAT is the issue you wish to pose to Hillary Clinton supporters?
Man, please tell me you don't bother to vote. . .
2007-02-15 02:51:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Excuse me, we've had two Bushes. Unfortunately
2007-02-15 02:00:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
28 Years ?????
Where did you go to school.....Mayberry ??/
Explain Please.....Also who would you pick...David Duke ???
2007-02-15 02:02:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by FREE4ALL8 3
·
2⤊
2⤋