English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Have you noticed there seem to be a lot of bands in Kerrang magazine at the moment that have very little to do with rock and metal and seem to sing about 'relationships' all the time?Which of those bands do you think have no business being in a magazine like Kerrang.

2007-02-15 01:56:37 · 8 answers · asked by Mark D 5 in Entertainment & Music Music

8 answers

kerrang is sooooo emo now. there isnt the slightest bit of rock in it. it used to be good, but bands like fall out boy, and my chemical romance do not count as decent rock music!!!!

2007-02-15 02:06:21 · answer #1 · answered by Life In Technicolor 4 · 3 0

Kerrangs been crap as long as i can remember. Back in 199*cough* i went to see a band at rock city. The place was heaving and everyone was having a great time yet kerrang reported a small audience and that it was crap. I'm not sure they were in the same place i was.

2007-02-15 10:05:29 · answer #2 · answered by El 3 · 1 0

It's all about sales. If the music is not cutting it, they fall back on the idol's lifestyle. It's time to go underground and develop a real magazine to include real 2007 bands like Tool, RAM,NIN, QSA, Korn,Ozzfesters......

2007-02-15 10:02:39 · answer #3 · answered by Cool Breeze 3 · 1 0

Don't know about the magazine but there is the same problem with the music channel - some stuff they show REALLY shouldn't be on there at all...

2007-02-15 09:59:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Kerrang's been crap for years.

2007-02-15 09:59:18 · answer #5 · answered by bassmonkey1969 4 · 1 1

Ever since the last spineshank article, they have been utter ****.

2007-02-15 10:01:25 · answer #6 · answered by Mark A 1 · 0 1

yeah i noticed that too
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6J4idh4rtRQ

2007-02-15 10:10:46 · answer #7 · answered by L 5 · 0 0

my chemical romance suck!

2007-02-15 10:50:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers